RE: RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Token Distribution Strategy
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Adjust Token Distribution Strategy

Words
190
Reading
1 min
1y

Hmm, how to vote if I like the slow down but definitely not the distribution of the added tokens. I guess it won't matter anyway how I vote, but these omnibus proposals are not great. I recently heard from someone in the team that we shouldn't think binary, why do we have to decide binary?

I personally think not adding to land is fine, because land has other benefits now and SPS mining on land seems to me like something that should be eliminated over time.

At the same I can't understand why the biggest share goes into staking, which I consider a complete waste of SPS. I would much rather see this allocated to modern and wild.

I also don't think tournaments deserve 20m when so many DAO sponsored tournaments turn into "buy SPS with DEC cheap" because there are not enough people signing up to not make it on the leaderboard.

And if I understand correctly we allocate 1m SPS to reward holding licenses instead of rewarding actually using licenses? What is the point in that?

TL:DR
Reductions yay, but please make multiple proposals for the individual allocations.

@cardeegel: Hmm, how to vote | Ecency