You have to at least submit your teams, if you don't you don't win, but submitting any team and not winning still counts, but it has been a long time since I actually managed to lose every single game,

There is discussion in the tournament discord right now about a modification / followup proposal to make the tournaments happen again. There are also average participations for each tournament type based

I said most CA. The ones cancelled are typically tournaments with heavy card restrictions or Expert level tournaments with very high CP requirements. Simply tournaments for which a small amount of players

I understand completely what you mean and I discussed the scaling down you describe in some draft versions, but I really don't like proposals that include too many changes where a voter may be forced to

This all sounds reasonable, but would require quite some rework of tournaments. A major advantage of the proposal above is, that it is very low effort.

This is not an anti GF proposal, most GF modern or wild are not affected. It mostly hits exotic configurations like GF Diamond alpha and untamed only. Yes it will drive away some application from these

You would have to check the tournaments, but most GF CA, GF modern and GF wild are not affected. Examples of affected tournaments are GF Diamond alpha and untamed only. That said, I am absolutely for driving

To be exact, they are not cancelled, they are still created, they just won't happen if not enough players sign up. I didn't want to overload the proposal and keep it focused, but I could see another proposal

My understanding is, that you have to define the minimum participation rate as well as the tournament prize positions in advance. Which means you could host a tournament rewarding only the top4 (so less

I think this is the wrong direction. You should give SPS more utility not less and reducing renting/delegation efficiency is reducing utility. If you want more benefit to staking, create more areas where

Hmm, how to vote if I like the slow down but definitely not the distribution of the added tokens. I guess it won't matter anyway how I vote, but these omnibus proposals are not great. I recently heard

This proposal is about allocating additional SPS to staking rewards. So if anything, this is going against the whitepaper, by prolonging the staking rewards which are set to expire mid of next year by

I would argue emissions can be reduced by offering alternatives to SPS rewards as well. Why not have the option for rewards to be purely in glint, for those who just want to get more reward cards. Or DEC

I'm absolutely against allocating any more SPS for staking rewards. Why should the DAO reward the mere holding of SPS, if on the other hand it wants to be paid for the mini-set in SPS. This makes absolutely

Until it hits 0.1425 cent you simply overpay when you use any other form of currency. By a lot. Imagine you are a new player, wanting to buy a pack, you have most likely credits because you don't bother

I voted for it and I like the idea in general, but the whole pay different prices in DEC, SPS and USDC is really bad in my opinion to say it in a neutral tone. Realistically nobody will pay in USDC unless

Personally I would rather see more different types of game modes instead of artificial league borders squeezed into the existing ones. The system as it was, was really bad, not being able to use the level

Very strong Ogame vibes from about 1999. Good times. :D

I don't think this will do anything positive, especially the reduction of the player rewards will be counter productive and put more pressure on the team to create enough burn to sustain rewards faster.

I think the main positive effect could be saving server costs, maybe, would like some input from the team. Did you talk to them? I am not buying that bots are renting tons of cheap cards, they mostly play