제목: Corrective Action Plan Form(115-0524)

Words
122
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
8y

(What was the concern?)

1.The 374 parts equivalent 26.9% were rejected as burr occurrence at final inspection of overlay inner/CUA72-263300A and recorded on Daily quality report, but there was no documented corrective action evidence.

​

  1. The manufacturing process audit on Utd12936320000/Panel was conducted using process check sheet on Feb 08 2018 and results are documented, but it was not related to actual painting process.

​

  1. Special characteristics/paint inspection and injected part receiving inspection were identified as sc and incorporated into CP at development of panel CTR, but PFMEA drafted on Mar 15 2018 without identifying 2scs.

​

  1. The assessment on strategic direction and process objective was made in 2018, but the needs and expectation of interested party were not identified and documented.

20160110_142037.jpg

제목: Corrective Action Plan Form(115-0524) | Ecency