When you get down to the base of the issue I believe that atheists and agnostics pose a threat to America. An atheist does not think that there creator even exists, so they sure do not think that there creator gave them any rights. The people that believe that atheists have no rights are mentally disturbed. So the question is 'where do atheists think that there rights come from?' And the answer has to be that atheists think that 100% of there rights come from the government. So if 2019 was 1770's, then atheists would be against our founding fathers and would be in favor of the british who thought that men only had the rights granted to him/her by the government. That is one of the reasons that I think that atheists and agnostics are dangerous.
The Declaration of Independence:
When in the Course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which ....the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them...., a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation.We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that ....all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights....., that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness—That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all Experi-ence hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security. Such has been the patient Sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the Necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.
The History of the present King of Great-Britain is a History of repeated Injuries and Usurpations, all having in direct Object the Establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid World. He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public Good.He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing Importance, unless suspended in their Operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.He has refused to pass other Laws for the Accommodation of large Districts of People, unless those People would relinquish the Right of Representation in the Legislature, a Right inestimable to them, and formidable to Tyrants only.He has called together Legislative Bodies at Places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the Depository of their public Records, for the sole Purpose of fatiguing them into Compliance with his Measures.He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly Firmness his Invasions on the Rights of the People.He has refused for a long Time, after such Dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the Dangers of Invasion from without, and Convulsions within.
If a person did not believe in anything that existed above what they could see...then they would be enemies to the cause of liberty. A person might say ' an atheists received his rights through evolution' then can not also things de-evolve?