RE: RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Update Minimum Rental Price from .1 DEC to 1 DEC
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Update Minimum Rental Price from .1 DEC to 1 DEC

Words
237
Reading
2 min
Listen
Play
2y

As we discussed previously on the draft of my proposal

I disagree with your view because I have a TON of currently unrentable cards that fall into that category.

Please remember, if a card IS rented at least ONE TIME in the 60 Days, it renews the 60 Day Window.

L4 Djinn Oshannus and Djinn Bjilka are a prime example you provided. The both rent for less than 1 DEC per day... but since they are playable cards, they will continue to rent and BENEFIT from the increase.

The L1, L2 and L3 versions rent for less naturally but if the proposal passes, there are only two probable outcomes:

A. The L4's rent for 1 DEC and the L3's and below fail to rent...
B. The L4's rent for 1 DEC but people realize they could list the L2's for 1, the L3's for 1.3 and the L4's for 1.5 DEC or something like that, making them all more profitable.

The benefit to option A is, if the L4's rent out at the Floor and the Lower Levels do not... this is a HUGE incentive to LEVEL UP THE CARDS.

With the removal of Card Level Caps in the Ranked Battles, this isn't a good thing... it's a GREAT thing!!

"Unplayable" cards simply won't rent and they won't clog up the servers with useless Tx's

That is why I see no downside to what you are saying.