In this video, I dive further into details about the negative ramifications of our debt based monetary system. Did you know that more money must be lent into existence every year to service the interest accrued on the older debt? Over time, both the banks and government have to take increasingly more extreme measures to keep the system propped up.
*“If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks…will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered…. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.”
-Thomas Jefferson
Back when I originally wrote this article and recorded the video I was still having a lot of issues with DTube so I uploaded the video to YouTube and imbedded it instead. Since DTube has been working well for me lately, I feel like now is a good time to add this video to DTube before I continue the series.
I have included the the original article below, with a few tweaks, for your convenience as there are valuable information and sources in it.
In my last Rant, I explained how money is actually created and the two biggest problems I see with our current debt-based monetary system. If you haven't read that article yet, I would highly recommend reading it to get the base of understanding necessary to fully grasping this post.
In this episode, I will discuss the methods that modern countries use to continuously increase the money supply. They have to do this in order for there to be enough money in circulation to pay the interest on existing debts.
This allows individuals, corporations, and governments the ability to borrow more without increasing debt carrying costs. This inevitably leads to increased borrowing.
Interest rates have been in decline since 1981.....
Falling interest rates are a major issue for retirees. Government bonds, which are traditionally considered the safest investment for those nearing or in retirement, no longer yield enough return to justify owning them. In fact, they often have a negative real rate of return once you factor in inflation.
This has been a major issue for government pension plans. Many of which are under funded.
Quantitative easing is a more direct way of boosting the money supply. The government or corporations issue bonds and the central bank buys them. This injects more money into the system and allows the suppression of interest rates to levels lower than a free market could keep them at. Further reading on Quantitative Easing
Extremely low rates tend to inflate asset prices. Stocks, bonds, and real estate are at or near record highs. While many people are happy with record high asset prices, I believe that on the whole they are negative for society. Those that didn't own them before the drastic price increases are often priced out of the market or end up having to over extend themselves financially to afford to buy in. This is one of the reasons why the top 10% continue to get richer while the living standards of the poor and middle class continue to deteriorate.
Stock prices seem to be more affected by hype and stock buybacks than actual fundamentals. There is no need for large corporations to turn a profit when they can borrow money for nothing. European Corporations can borrow money at less then 0% interest.
Tesla now has the largest market cap of all North American auto makers and has yet to turn a profit!
The question of why Tesla, which lost $675 million on $7 billion in revenue last year, is worth more than GM (with 2016 revenue of $166.4 billion and net income of $9.43 billion) and Ford (with 2016 sales of $151.8 billion and net income of $4.6 billion) is a complicated one.
Most people wouldn't consider immigration as a tool to manage the economy. In reality, immigration is a potent stimulant of both debt and GDP because it increases the population. All those new citizens want housing, new vehicles and credit cards just like everyone else. Excessive immigration can cause all sorts of societal issues, however, I'm not going to address that topic in this post. In the future, I will likely do a rant discussing some of the issues I see in Canada. Most people don't know that Canada has one of the highest per capita immigration rates in the world.
There are plenty of justifications for why we need high immigration levels including a need to replace an ageing population or offering humanitarian aid. In my opinion, the primary reason why the government allows mass immigration is that it creates more new suckers to prop up the ponzi-scheme debt-based monetary system.
Negative rates are a continuation of the falling interest rate policy we have been under for the past 35 years. It further expands the money supply by punishing savers and rewarding borrowing.
While there are already many countries that have negative interest rates, I believe it will become even more wide spread and be adopted by countries like Canada and the United States. If the central bank tries to go too far into negative territory then people would simply hoard cash. Because of this, you can also expect a push for a cashless society.
Basically, this is a scheme where the government pays people a fairly large sum of money every month just for existing; the program is intended to cover their basic needs. While this sounds far fetched I have been hearing more and more about this on local talk radio and other media sources. Ontario even has a pilot project to study this idea.
Wikipedia'sexplanation of BasicIncome
