RE: RE: So do we have any sort of standards or is proofofbrain a total free for all? also downvotes...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: So do we have any sort of standards or is proofofbrain a total free for all? also downvotes...

Words
290
Reading
2 min
6y

I feel like there is a distinction between posts that are made directly from the front-end and ones that just drop in the tag. I get a better vibe from 80% of the posts coming from the front-end and they're usually either talking about POB or they are generating engagement from others here in the community. This might just be my tastes, I don't really interact much with the financial or crypto-focused stuff, still read it though.

With that being said, I'm just focusing on the posts on the front-end with my votes now. Occasionally I'll drop by and read something that catches my eye but I want to pass my vote to people who are interested in the success of the tribe.

In terms of content, it is going to be entirely subjective. It's no surprise that a post relating to POB is going to be rewarded better than something else since it's a common interest everyone shares. Using it as an example, it could be decent quality but people disagree with the contents, so downvotes seem fair. On the other hand, it could be of lower quality and full of good info, yet someone thinks the post quality is poor or the info doesn't deserve the rewards, the downvote seems fair. There are always going to be arguments for and against.

People have to think for themselves at the end of the day. Downvote if you disagree with something or if you feel like something is shit, if it creates drama it's showing that someone or both people in the exchange are not handling the situation well, which is a learning experience if anything. You can revoke all votes, ain't such a big deal.


@calumam: I feel like there | Ecency