I appreciate this post and think it is important to look closely at metrics and ensure all funded projects are held accountable for their funding.

I’d be interested to hear InLeo’s response to your points. In my eyes, I see InLeo working hard for the chain. I see a lot of legwork on interoperability with other chains and big pushes in innovation regarding what InLeo offers. I know that beyond the DHF funding, they have invested a lot of their own money as well (which truly should be expected of all funded projects).

Honestly, I don’t use InLeo much, but I do see them as an asset to Hive. I guess the question is always: is this DHF investment also benefiting the entire community and not just the heads of whatever funded project?

As I say, I think it’s great that you are holding feet to the flame, as they say. It reminds me a bit of the good work @blanchy has done concerning the Value Plan.

I’m curious if you would indulge my query. I notice you often comment on or GIF Blanchy’s Value Plan posts but don’t upvote them. I often wonder why more of the bigger players are not holding the Value Plan’s feet to the flame in terms of transparency and metric analysis regarding the true benefit of the various projects.
(Perhaps there is some politics amongst the bigger hive players that I’m not aware of, as there seems to a lot of crickets besides smaller accounts)

I am in no way shitting on VP as a concept—many of the projects are clearly trying to bring value to the chain. However, I do think that more oversight and pressure from the community seem needed.

I don’t often see the voices that I think could have a greater influence on how VP funds are distributed and what expectations the community should have after those funds are received. Me and a handful of other smallish accounts comment, but I’m just one Butt. 🤓