RE: RE: BRO, LGN & CINE - The Fraud of Raymond Baxter
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: BRO, LGN & CINE - The Fraud of Raymond Baxter

Words
171
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
10M

!LOL no, that's Ray in the picture.

Sadly, I missed those posts about women being offered money to shill BRO and CINE and not getting paid. Had I known that, I would've exited immediately.

With the exception of BRO and LGN, I've made most of my money back, so like others say a lot of it is "house money." I do agree that most of it is backed by nothing.

I think you're right about LEO. They have a history of projects failing, printing LEO to "reimburse" people and then moving on to new projects to keep "the machine" going. With the exception of a small gamble (emphasis on gamble because that's what it amounts to) on LBI, I steer clear of anything they do or touch. I don't see them keeping up APR on their new tokens since it relies mainly on curation rewards and LeoDex fees. Considering the LeoDex fees aren't substantial or reliable, it ultimately becomes a curation-backed token which can't sustain the promised APR.

!BBH
!PIZZA
!ALIVE