I have given many ideas about how to make continuous, non-polluting electricity creating devices. However, i haven't really talked about how to make free energy devices. And that is because we can't use them right now. We have to get to a place where everyone has grown up enough that no one would think of using such for war, no one would think of enacting war. And so, we really can't cognize the free-energy device, although it is VERY simple.
It is like Tesla's tower. We have so much of the plans, a lot written about it in Tesla's own hand. We have patents. And…
No one has built a working Tesla Tower. Few have built Tesla Coils, and fewer have tuned them correctly. Although there is all kinds of plans, books and know-how available on that subject.
I have seen people trying to build a "Tesla Tower" asking for funding on GoFundYourself, where their claim to fame was that they were making sure to build it the exact height Tesla did. But, frighteningly, they didn't even read Tesla's own words on it. That the tertiary coil should be placed as high as possible. And that Tesla thought about using balloons to hold it aloft. The tower's height was not that important.
With all of these people working on it, we should have figured it out by now. But, just like powered flight, it happened at a time when we were ready to start using it. (there were 3 inventors of powered flight. Only the Wright Bros beat them by a week)
So, although free-energy is close, simple, and we could really use the electricity right now, it is beyond our reckoning. Out of our cognitive grasp.
Modern Materialistic Science has done everything i can think of to derail humanity and keep them from discovering free energy.
Stating that there is NO AETHER! Their proof, a test, where they did the minimum number of observations to be considered a test, found something, and called it nothing.
And, if the Michelson-Morley experiment was actually legit, it only disproved ONE! idea of how the aether worked. That the aether was stationary three dimensional grid (xyz), and that the Earth moved through it. There are all kinds of other thoughts on it. Such as the aether moves downward, and is what holds us to the Earth. The aether is curved, and/or rings the objects in the universe. Like waves at the coast. And many, many other ideas that were never tested. Further, Michelson-Morley's device disproved their findings. When a scientist took it to various altitudes and found he got different readings.
It is hard to find aether energy when the aether is denied existence.
Modern Materialistic Science also stands firmly on the "Laws" of Thermodynamics. Although it only sorta exists in laboratories and there are hundreds of disproofs in nature, these "scientists" still say that it has always held true.
The "laws" of Thermodynamics is more of a religious view, than any sort of scientific theory. It IS how Modern Materialists view the word.
Fortunately, all of these are just beliefs. And the universe shows us different.
But, if you wanted to make sure no one finds free-energy, than what better thing than a "Law" that says it can't exist?
Modern Materialistic Scientists believe that the world is a bunch of matter, and that it exists, is solid, is the everything.
A different view, and one that quantum physics supports, is that the world is (re)created trillions of time a second. That each world is static, and that we see movement by jumping between these worlds. What a different view! And, it means that energy is being created trillions of times a second. Enough to create whole universes.
Now, if science believed that the world and energy, was being constantly created, then a free-energy device is only a matter of figuring out how to tap into that power. Even Tesla said so.
The universe is a bunch of 12 sided objects, all nested together like a honeycomb. (too bad "science" is base 10) And all of these exist in a balance of energy. If you unbalanced two opposite sides, then energy would flow through the space to try to rebalance them. And there you go, free-energy.
Why did i read the rest of this article? Why couldn't you just say that?
Well, we also have to talk about how humanity will have to grow up. And make science scientific again! We are soooo close, and so far away.
Will we create perpetual motion machines (not free-energy) first, or will science admit that it is wrong about the "Laws" of thermodynamics first? Or, will it be almost the same moment? Like, a giant shift in human consciousness.
We do not need the free-energy devices. The Earth gives us lots of energy. Very abundant energy. But banksters would prefer to continue burning the earth up, so that they stay in power.
We see the mother WEFers promoting shtupid "green" energy like wind and solar. Most windmills will never pay for their construction. A net loss to the environment.
We can make wave energy along all of our shorelines, right now. Lots of energy, fairly consistent throughout the day. Works harder during storms when you need it more. But, you get people protesting about keeping the view pristine, while also protesting oil burning.
We can make geothermal energy by drilling a 3 mile deep well (similar to an oil well) and using that to boil a refrigerant for continuous power. But you can't experiment with good geothermal energy spots, because they are all controlled by universities.
We can even build magnet motors, and use those to turn gen-sets. They work, but aren't providing enough torque. I am sure that someone will figure out a new twist, and then we will have a world powered by spinning contraptions moved by magnets.
Will people be upset with science, when they find out that the group hiding free-energy from us was none other than "Science"?
