This is really quite the quandary. When you start learning things that you were taught are wrong, and then you see that MSM is lying, and then you figure out that the experts that they have on are lying. Where does it end? What is actually true?
Everything in this list is a LOT more true than the MSM and the actor/doctor/physicists are telling you. However, it really cannot be verified. It cannot be disproven and swept away, because it has a lot of truth in it, but it cannot be verified.
So, now you have figured out that so much of what you know, and what you are told, is all a lie. But, what do you do about it? How can you rely on anything that is in your brain? T.H.E.Y. have even tried the ultimate confusion strategy, we are all brains in a jar hooked up to stimulus being fed to us by some unknown entity. So, now you can't even trust your brain, your fingers, your senses.
So, what do you do?
When i talk to people about the lies in our text books, they are (almost) always, "well than, what is true?". Meaning, they want as complete of a theory as what is in the books, and they want it all at once. They cannot deal with the old theory going away and being left with nothing.
Like, if you bring up all the failures of the ball earth, normal people cannot deal with that. They will immediately go to flat earth, and attack it. And they are really incredulous when they find that "flat earth" is not a complete, coherent theory. That, there is in fact many flat earth theories. After they find this out, they are usually not able to (no longer able to) discuss any of the failures of ball earth, or the lies of NASA.
I believe that this is in part due to how we learn through stories, and also because schooling teaches us "to know" something. Specifically, to repeat what the teacher told them. If they do so, they are a good student, if they do not then they are a bad person and stupid. This training as children has stopped most scientific advancement. Because, to do that, we have to look into the unknown, and question what we see, and just as important question what we think we know.
It is interesting that what most people remember is the stories. Like "Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 1942." But, we do not recognize the rest of it as a story. That "Columbus proved the world was round", and that "people before then were stupid and believed the world was flat" This story is what keeps people from even thinking that things may not be as we are told.
The world of knowledge has become so large, and complex that one person cannot know it all. (this is a false story) Thus, we have specialized into specific areas. And so, we just accept that we do not know as much as the expert. (which isn't bad in itself) However, when the expert is just an actor, reading lines that sound good, then we are not only lied to, but set up to believe the lie, and never question the lie.
There are so many people, who's defense in many arguments is "i saw it on TV". And there is almost no defense for this argument. You could be WELL studied in science, and they will still follow up with things like, "you need to go back to school and learn."
Further, it has been shown that if it was your mother or father that told you the story (about how the world works) then you feel like you are betraying their love if you accept someone else's story about scientific facts.
This kind of thing also happens if you connect with the persuasive/charismatic person in the screen. You strongly resist a change in their narrative.
So, comprehend, that the hardwiring in your brain could be holding you back from actually finding the truth.
This one is very frustrating.
Those same teachers who tell you that the Law of Thermodynamics is a law because it has been repeatedly proven, say, about everything else that you cannot prove anything. You know that one disproof, and blam, there goes the theory.
But, if all it takes is one disproof, and here is a device that is over-unity, over 100% efficient (so there is more energy coming out of it than going into it) then the Law of Thermodynamics is blam, a disproven theory. However, the same scientists state that that is not really a disproof.
How do we deal with such blatant double standards? In a field that is supposed to be about finding the truth??!!
And then, they stick the boot in! They start questioning if we can actually know. That tree, that we see over there, may not actually be a tree, and may not actually exist.
We really can't know what is right to any degree of absolute certainty. We will often have to carry several stories in our heads about how the world works, and keep updating percentages of how well they work for you, in the real world.
I know this is hard, but you need to train yourself away from true/false understandings. You are not a dunce because you no longer believe what the teacher told you.
Today is a very hard and dangerous time for the truth.
We have a group of professionals that are telling us the narrative, and they also are very much controlling the counter-narrative. Often making the opposition to look like idiots.
If you listen to them, you will not know the truth. Both sides of what they say is false.
You have to get to the groups that are actually talking about new theories. However, some of these are actually lunatics, freaks or mad scientists. And then you have to separate the truth from the fluff and the insanity. But, at least there is some truth in there somewhere.
In the future, we will look back and see how badly we were deceived by those who controlled the printing of the text books. Today, there are too many people who interests in twisting or destroying the truth.
