Drat, it is obvious here that i should have written a post... but i cut corners. (and i probably already wrote the post)

The double slit experiment proves that observing a phenomena changes the phenomena.

The scientific method only applies to things you can actually observe and observe with repetition.

Thus, the scientific method has to be changed.

And that is not the only piece. Many quantum experiments are such that they HAVE TO remove the observer.
With an observer there, they get 1 of 4 outcomes. Not the 32 they surmised.
Remove the observer, and they got 1 of 32.

Further, we do not work in the order we have shown in the linear definition of the scientific method.
We actually work both ends toward the middle.
A new model of scientific constraints should be developed that actually works with humans instead of against them.

We still can't see atoms.
They are only a theoretical model of the observed phenomena.
Case in point, the Cern Supercolider.

Imagine if you will, you had a car, and you wanted to understand what made it go fast.
Would you rip a piece of it off and then fire it out of a cannon to see what happens?

Of course you wouldn't. By doing so you destroy exactly what you are trying to study.
Cern will soon be the most expensive museum ever built.