100 foot long lightening arcs on command

Cool, but irrelevant

This is actually the core of the argument.
For 100 years science has been going down the wrong path.

So, something that Tesla was able to do, because he actually understood what he was doing, was simple.
The same thing, if you asked any "modern materialistic scientist" is nearly impossible.

I bring this up, because there is a lot of proof from newspaper men stating that Tesla did it.

And modern scientists have completely failed in this endeavour.
So much so that they state that Tesla was a hack, a fraud.

Thus, this is the pièce de résistance! Not an irrelevant piece of trivia.

A theory that can't really be tested.

Yet it has been reportedly tested with the expected results repeatedly...

And here is why this subject is so hard to talk about.
Everyone talks about these "tests", but it is all that anyone knows.
The broadcast snippets. The things glossed over in "science" class.

If it was just "these tests" then i could disprove Einstein's theories in one go.
But it isn't. Here is an example.

Einstein's theory was said to be correct because it modelled the motion of Mercury better. 96%
Thus, by the same logic, we should throw Einstein out when we get someone with a better model, correct?
As i have stated, a lady astronomer worked out a model using equal areas in equal times, that is 99.9999% accurate.

THUS! in order to keep Einstein's "tests" as "expected results repeatedly" we have to ignore this new model.

And so it goes with every "test" you could bring up.

However no one even knows the theory of relativity to defend it when i state

• the speed of light changes. (it's recorded in science textbooks... until meteorologists got together and set it)
• the speed of light has been breached.

These two put paid to the throwing out of the "Theory of Relativity", but no one argues that.
That is to say, the basis of your theory has been disproven, come back when your theory does not disregard observable phenomena.

Neither must be wholly accepted or rejected

And yes, it is that black and white.
Or, i should say, at least one should be rejected.

Einstein's and Tesla's core belief is diametrically opposed.
One believed in the aether, the other made a complex theory to continue a lie that the aether doesn't exist.
And that is the basis, the root, of the issue. It changes everything.

At what point can we say that science has gone down the wrong road for over 100 years?
And thus, turn this thing around and actually make real scientific progress?