Modern Materialistic Science believes that there is a fixed universe out there. That it is real, and we all see the same thing. And thus, the Scientific Method sorta makes sense, if that were true.

But, it is not true. We effect the experiment by observing it.
Such has been proven by the Dual Slit Experiment.

Further, the scientific method has a faulty logic. We do not work from one end to the other end.
We work from both ends to the middle and see if they join.

So, the scientific methods' flow chart is wrong for how people think.
And the basis of the scientific method is false.

Thus, it needs to be revised into something far more usable.

That said, if you find one piece of counter evidence, the scientific method says the theory is wrong, and needs to be thrown out.

Soooo, how many pieces of counter evidence does one need to throw out "settled science"?