I comprehend what you are saying. I have studied anarcho-capitalism well.
However, i will not take "it will work itself out" as an answer.
I also agree that the govern-cement is the worst thing to put in charge of this.
My query is something along the lines of, we, as a society, have to work out how to integrate these people into our group... (or kill them). Meaning we have to leave menial tasks for them to do. And we have to push away more adept applicants from these jobs. (kinda like we should get rid of the middle age immigrants from the burger flipper positions so that our teens can have a job that can train them)
But this requires a lot of working together.
Further, how much of a person's time should be spent keeping another person alive?
Some people require an entire other person's life so that they can live a poor existence.
If we have a person who wants to spend all of their life helping another person, then we have something that may work. If we don't...
I have no nice solutions. And it may be that nature (storms and riots) will take this decision away from us.
Those that left the cities and formed small communities for mutual support only allowing in members that could help the community... well, that usually excludes and of the problem
RE: Equality vs. the Pareto Principle