This is completely outside the scope of what i was talking about.

My thesis was to eliminate the people who want a unlawful community
from voting for laws. (Laws in dealing with human interaction; murder, rape, theft)

Lets say, for a bad example, that the poor inner city teens have turned to the drug trade, because that is the best job they can get.

If they were allowed to vote, they would vote for less strict drug laws.
And this leads to a breaking down of law.

As i said it was a bad example, however, you need to look at the demographics.
90% of people are decently good. 10% are trouble makers, free spirits, ne-er do wells...

Now, what i am speaking about is changing the game itself.
We don't live in a world of law. We have a sham system that calls itself law.
While making everyone a criminal. Yes, you have committed at least three felonies today, and are just waiting for the po-po to get around to you.

So, as part of creating a better place, we need to rework "the law"
One part is the actual rules.

And we need to keep those voting for such, as a group, such that they all want a nice orderly life.
One bad apple spoils the barrel.

Yes, the drug illegalization laws were just to destroy the little people and set up the big people into places of power they couldn't ever be dislodged. Crime pays for the top.