Well, the answer to your question is, all of this is bunk.

The elite train their children to be sociopathic rulers.
The masses train their children to be sheep.

It is the tiny percentage that buck the system that make any difference.

What you resist, persists.

So, rising up in unity against the "oppressors" makes it impossible to remove the oppressors.
You know, the 99% attacking the leaves, and only 1% attacking the roots.

The focus in the above post is all about focussing on the leaves.

Marx is to blame.

No, really.
He got the people to believe in two groups. The workers, and Everyone-else.

Telling the workers that they should own the fruits of their labor.
But not telling them about their labor.

The common worker, if they were making a part themselves could barely make one a day.
In a factory, they could make a hundred a day.
The common worker cannot make a factory. Can't even conceive of a factory.
The engineer can build a factory, but cannot staff or run all the input/outputs.

No, it takes a special kind of person who can see the whole thing and get all the parts to come together.
And this group is the second group to be killed in any socialist/communist take over.

So, the worker is back to building one a day, or building a hundred last years parts in the old, outdated factory.

There will never be unity in the people.
They all have different desires and goals.

And so, any future structure will have to be designed with that in mind.

And it is really simple things.

Such as, if a govern-cement entity is not doing its job, the people should be able to turn off its money supply by not doing anything.

So, the people actively go to the computer and pay their taxes, and send their money to each individual bureau by their perception of their usefulness. When a bureau falls below a certain level of incoming funds, it is closed immediately.

This is what real power looks like.
Not that voting for the representative-scum that will do the least harm