Sorta, but there are two meanings to corporate pollution, or what we could define as externalities (stuff pushed onto the world)
- pollutants that are put into the air, water, ground to ... hope the earth takes care of them
- the environmental catastrophes caused by marketing and extreme wealth inequality.
However, there are many areas where our polluting is better than the alternative. Many homes are heated by oil and natural gas. Which is far superior than going back to wood fireplaces.
Why everyone doesn't have a passive solar heated house now is beyond me.
The super-rising gas prices will change this...
There is nothing we can do about the coastal cities.
Great lengths and huge expenses will be spent trying to fight a losing battle.
The mega-city as a source of collecting people to work in factories is over. We should be abandoning these edifices of corruption.
Everything is against the mega-city.
The jobs have left, but people keep holding onto the idea of the job to live the american dream.
Real storms are coming.
Real earthquakes are coming.
and that is on top of Antifa burning the cities from within.
If you are in a city, get out.
If i could just publish plans about how to create energy and people would take them and get the money together and build them, then that would be great.
But, we have groups who are against that. Seriously against that. As in, people wind up dead, against that.
So, in order to work with number 3, we have to expose these groups as the evil that they are.
RE: Guess who has been giving out accurate data on Global Warming?