about half of my posts and comments are just such disproofs.

Now, if the govern-cement lies about subject A, and you know the lie for a fact.
and A→B→C→D where D is relativity, and you see signs of lying in B and C, what are the odds of D being a lie?

Special relativity has not been widely tested.
It is actually only a few big tests, and their evidence in not conclusive.
Further, there are better theories that describe the evidence better.

Lets take this piece, relativity was declared the best because it more accurately predicted the orbit of Mercury. to about 96%.
A female astronomer published a book recently, that has a theory that is 99.9999% accurate in predicting the orbit of Mercury. And it doesn't use relativity.

Another piece, the electric universe model predicts all kinds of phenomena we see in our solar system that relativity fell short on.

So, to me, when people say

Special relativity has been widely tested, and the predictions of the theory have been verified on numeous occasions.

i hear, "The govern-cement made all these tests and said that special relativity was tested and verified."

If you take away all those big govern-cement tests you are left with only one... which is better explained by the electric universe theory.

Oh, i forgot to mention all the things that disprove relativity. (well some of them)

Telepathy happens across any distance seemingly without time delay. (faster than light)
Entangled particles transmit information between the two instantaneously. (again, faster than light)
A electronic bridge of capacitors and resistors sends a signal to the other end faster than light. (anyone can perform this, except the time measurement is difficult)

Basically you end up with the question, who do you believe Tesla or Einstein?
They are mutually exclusive.