This statement really fucks with me. As i can do soooo much... but not really. Any one of my ideas could change the world... but does the world want to change? I have been burned at the stake for daring

And you are missing the other half. What i am hung up on is that the observer can completely change the experiment outcome, not just by observation, but also because of their desire for a specific outcome.

Yes, the world of "Cancer" is horrifying. I used to work in the "Cancer" industry; never have i seen a more retched hive of scum and villainy. I like the paths you have gone down in

Drat, it is obvious here that i should have written a post... but i cut corners. (and i probably already wrote the post) The double slit experiment proves that observing a phenomena changes the phenomena.

Everything i learned in college science class, i later learned was wrong. EVERYTHING!! This includes the vaunted scientific method. You would think that scientific people would be able to held to the

Banks used to be safe places to put your money. I never heard of anyone having any problems that weren't immediately worked out with a bank. Today i hear of banks grilling you for taking out too much money.

Yep, this is what "modern materialistic scientists" believe these days. And its all bollox. The whole thing. The basis for each idea is wrong. In Schrödinger's Cat experiment, there is NO 50/50.

Think about things like speed limit. How do you know how fast you are going? What is the accuracy of your speedometer? You could be rightfully, to the best of your ability, be following the law... but

Some laws are even in opposition to other laws. As in, you are a criminal. Some laws are so precise that you can't ever comply. You are human, you fail. And still, there are laws still on the books that

I have heard McAfee talk about the "buying things with Monero" and the people that work for Monero, and the economy that is growing around that. I really should learn more about that, because

I am really unsure about the future of Monero. It may be the coin that gets shot full of the most holes. That said, i would keep part of my stash in Monero. I would actively work on accepting Monero if

Well, .... yes, i do come off as very sure of things that i write... because they are the things i am sure about. We, on this platform, do not get to the place where i would be talking about theory and

even our entire global system of Patriarchy Observation says we have anything but a patriarchy. Men have to fight to get 80%/20% child custody (where women can assume 50/50 minimum) An epidemic of men

War 1 + 1 = 0 Peace 1 + 1 = 2 win-win 1 + 1 = 4 (or more) The thought that universe is filled with war, or warring planets, etc is patently stupid. It is only thinkable by a race of people who hasn't solved

has bitcoin made its dead cat bounce yet?

First of all, "Modern Allopathic Medicine" only deals with ⅐th of the human body. How can such ignorant people talk about longevity in any meaningful way? Next, what is going to happen is that

Is it racist to NOT watch bad shows? Shows where they make the plot and character development subservient to wokeness? How can anyone make a great show with that kind of limitation? Blazing Saddles was

Why is this an emergency? This was an emergency a decade ago, but the MSM kept droning on about "Climate Warming", then "Climate Change". Even 10 years ago it was very apparent of what

I am pretty sure this is about gaming. The elites have gamed out this scenario many times. And now, that the did the head fake (Wuhan-flu) are about to wipe out a significant portion of the population

I like this chap. But, the first time i watched him i didn't know if the first part was a put-on or his actual self.