RE: RE: 58.97 BTC Lost: The Coldcard Attack Is Bigger Than One Victim
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: 58.97 BTC Lost: The Coldcard Attack Is Bigger Than One Victim

Words
134
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
24d

This 3.5-year latency metric is honestly the most eye-opening part of the whole report. It completely changes how we should look at this.

A lot of people in the Bitcoin space treat cold storage like a "set it and forget it" step. You get a hardware wallet, write down your seed, and assume you're bulletproof forever. But this Coldcard incident proves that hardware alone isn't magic if your OpSec or seed generation process had a flaw from day one.

For me, the takeaway isn't that cold wallets don't work—it's that single-key cold storage leaves zero room for error. It really makes a strong case for moving toward multi-institution or multi-vendor multisig setups once you're holding serious amounts for the long haul.

Appreciate you pulling together the numbers from TRM and Galaxy Research, great write-up!

@btcevolucion: This 3.5-year | Ecency