๐๐ฏr๊ปr โแแ๊ป๐ แ rโธ๐พะดr R๊ ะดสทรณโธโ ๐mฬฅ๐๊ ๐โธ๊ป๐๐ / ๐r @ ๐๐๐๊
https://www.quora.com/Do-you-think-that-in-100-years-time-the-term-Russia-will-become-a-mere-historical-noun-and-no-longer-a-contemporary-political-existence-such-as-Hittite-Byzantine-Ottoman-etc/answer/Ridzwan-Abdul-Rahman?comment_id=349857328&comment_type=2&filter=all&nsrc=notif_page&sncid=42196518460&snid3=56453589372
Ridzwan Abdul Rahman
Self employed (2000โpresent)
Russia is getting stronger and stronger. Even NATO has not found a way to beat them. With support from many countries in Asia, Africa and South America, Russia will only get relatively stronger compared to the US, especially with the USD about to be rejected by a large part of the world, thereby reducing its competitiveness. With the USD significantly dropping in value, how will the US pay off its $35 trillion external debt?
Besides, Russia is rich in minerals such as iron ore, manganese, chromium, nickel, platinum, titanium, copper, tin, lead, tungsten, diamonds, phosphates and gold. Ever since many of the Western companies have left Russia, Russia has gradually been building up its local industries. Their mineral assets can form the base for their future growth, together with advancements in technical areass (through cooperation with China) and military areas.
Perhaps, in a hundred years time, Russia will be among the superpowers of the world, together with China and India, while the US will be a spent force.
Adrian Hyland
Russia are begging North Korea for weapons. Theyr fucked mate
Andrei-Viorel Pop
โ Even NATO has not found a way to beat them.โ - is NATO at war with Russia?
Destroyer of Worlds
If NATO faced off directly against Russia then Russia would lose.NATO are only providing enough weapon systems to defend Ukraine. However Their supply of weapons has been too slow.
Tom Lai
Nato will the mere historical noun instead