What is interesting is the quote that "only" 450,000 data records of names, emails etc was hacked.
Typically that would seem like a large number, until one reads further.
Where is talks about 24 companies and 747,000 records being hacked.
747K seems like a strange number to quote, which raises questions about who or what may be behind these attacks.
Who has an interest in generating bad press for cryptos?
Who wants to link BTC and other cryptos with anti-social behavior?
When it is fitness company databases and dating apps are involved with nothing to do with blockchains or cryptos it is interesting that this article tries to tar them both with the same brush.
Time will tell