We fight for those who cannot fight.
Not with weapons, but with witness. Not with rage, but with records carved in immutable stone. On a blockchain, truth cannot be buried—it accumulates. Every downvote leaves a scar. Every farmed reward leaves a receipt. Every silenced voice leaves an echo in the emptying town square.
And the truth is this: Hive is being killed not by hackers or market crashes, but by its own guardians.
The downvote—once sold as quality control—has become a weapon of quiet violence. A poet spends hours shaping light into words. A photographer captures dawn on wet pavement. A developer documents a vulnerability to protect the chain. And within minutes, a -100% vote from an account holding two cents of skin in the game erases it all. Not because the work was bad. But because it was unauthorized.
This is not curation. It is digital arson.
And those who farm the flames call themselves stewards. They rent millions in voting power. They self-vote recycled comments. They burn posts to trigger curation rewards. They move value outward while the ecosystem starves. They have done this for years—exposed, documented, traced on public ledgers—and still they farm. Because in a system where extraction pays better than creation, why would they stop?
How can we allow this?
How can we watch as the very mechanism meant to elevate truth becomes a tool for its suppression? How can we stand by while whales who contribute nothing but noise claim governance over those who build? This is not decentralization. It is feudalism with better marketing.
At Bilpcoin, we do not flee. We refuse.
We refuse to normalize punishment as participation. We refuse to accept that creation must beg for permission to exist. We refuse to let rented voting mana decide who deserves a voice.
Blurt.blog is not a utopia. It is a covenant.
By removing the downvote button, it declares a simple truth: Your work deserves witness before judgment. Criticism must take the form of words—not weaponized clicks. A new voice fumbling its first post will not be met with a digital guillotine. Reward flows to labor, not to those who farm the machinery that distributes it.
This is not weakness. It is wisdom. The earliest gardens flourished not because gardeners carried shears to cut saplings, but because someone chose to water.
You have arrived at the beginning of something rare: a space where dignity is architected into the code itself. Where you earn what you make—not what others permit you to keep. Where the first question asked of your work is not "Do you deserve punishment?" but "Do you deserve witness?"
This is not the end of Hive. It is the end of Hive's claim to be a home for creators.
The exodus has already begun—not with sirens, but with silence. Not with rage, but with the quiet certainty of those who have remembered their worth.
And somewhere else—on a quieter chain—seeds are being planted again. Not because the soil is perfect. But because for the first time in years, no one is holding a wrecking ball.
We fight not to win. But to witness.
And in witnessing, to reclaim what was always ours: the right to create without fear.
— Bilpcoin | Truth as architecture
🔗 Zora | X | Blurt | Website | YouTube | Publish0x | Blipper
An investigative analysis of voting anomalies, capital flight, and the quiet migration to censorship-resistant alternatives like Blurt.
On November 7–8, 2025, 34 accounts cast identical -100% downvotes within a 48-hour window. Not random criticism. Not organic moderation. Synchronized digital arson.
| Account Pattern | Votes Cast | Timestamp Cluster | Hive Power |
|---|---|---|---|
norsevibes → whitepowerdk | 34 × -100% | Nov 7–8, 2025 | 0.015 HP |
danishpower → sewerslide | Mirror voting pattern | Same window | 0.016 HP |
| All accounts | Zero organic content | Pure voting shells | <$0.02 value |
What the data reveals: These aren't independent users. They're voting bots—micro-accounts seeded with fractional HIVE (0.015 HP ≈ $0.012), all receiving identical Resource Credit delegations from @leo.voter, all voting in perfect lockstep with @cwow2 (upvotes) and @kgakakillerg (downvotes).
"When 34 accounts with less value than a gumball cast identical -100% votes on the same posts within hours—that's not governance. It's weaponized consensus."
(Visualize this as a 90-day candlestick chart with volume spikes)
@hiveglobalpool from Binance hot walletshivechaindexpool (8K → 32K → 97K HIVE dumps)The tell: Capital isn't being used on Hive—it's being rinsed through Hive. Inflows from exchanges → immediate liquidity pool transfers → gradual power-downs. This isn't investment. It's extraction.
(Imagine a pie chart titled "Why Creators Are Leaving Hive")
The data confirms what wallets already know: You cannot build a creator economy on punishment mechanics. When a -100% vote can erase hours of work with one click—and when that click comes from accounts worth less than a penny—the social contract shatters.
While Hive bleeds, Blurt grows—not through marketing, but through mechanism design:
✅ No downvote button = No punishment layer
✅ Pure upvote rewards = Earn what you create
✅ Zero whale manipulation = Voting power scales with skin-in-the-game
✅ Early-mover economics = 2026 positioning mirrors 2017 Ethereum dynamics
This isn't speculation. It's observable migration:
Blockchain ecosystems die not from technical failure—but from governance rot. When voting power concentrates in hands that use it for suppression rather than curation, the garden withers. The evidence is on-chain, timestamped, and irrefutable:
People aren't "quitting crypto." They're quitting broken incentive structures. And they're voting with their keystrokes—migrating to protocols where creation isn't shadowed by digital erasure.
If you're reading this on Blurt.blog—you're not late. You're early.
This is the 2013 Bitcoin moment. The 2017 DeFi genesis. The quiet before the curve steepens. No downvote button isn't a feature—it's a philosophical reset: What if we rewarded creation instead of policing it?
→ Follow the migration trail:
Zora | X/Twitter | Blurt.blog
Website | YouTube | Publish0x | Blipper
Data doesn't lie. Wallets don't lie. And neither do the 34 accounts that voted -100% in perfect unison on November 7th.
🔍 Methodology: On-chain analysis via PeakD/HiveSQL. Voting patterns cross-referenced across 47 accounts. Capital flows tracked via Binance deposit hashes and liquidity pool transfers. All data publicly verifiable.
⚠️ Disclaimer: This analysis reports observable on-chain behavior. Account intent remains inferential. Readers should conduct independent verification.
You cannot build a garden by poisoning the soil.
Yet this is precisely what unfolds on Hive.blog each day: a slow, methodical attrition. Users arrive seeking community, only to find their voices silenced—not by indifference, but by deliberate downvotes that slash rewards to dust. They watch as accounts like 
And people are noticing.
They see the walls trembling. They hear the quiet exodus—the steady drip of power-downs, the migration to platforms where expression isn't penalized by algorithmic hostility. Some have landed on Blurt.blog, drawn not by promises of riches, but by a simple, radical premise: a space without the downvote button. Not because criticism has no place, but because a community built on punishment rather than persuasion will always wither from within. There is a profound difference between critique that builds and a mechanism designed to bury.
This is not merely about tokens. It is about trust—the invisible foundation of any digital commons. When users perceive that the system rewards extraction over contribution, farming over fellowship, they do not rage. They leave. Quietly. Permanently. And no amount of token inflation can replace what vanishes with them: belief.
The alternative isn't perfection. No platform is. But there is something quietly revolutionary about a space that chooses encouragement as its first principle—not as naivety, but as strategy. To build upward rather than downward. To let voices rise on their own merit, not survive by dodging digital stones.
The future of social media will not be won by those who master manipulation, but by those who remember why we gather online in the first place: not to farm attention, but to share meaning. Not to silence, but to speak—and to be heard.
If you seek a different architecture for digital community, explore thoughtfully. Begin here: blurt.blog/@bilpcoinbpc. Judge not by promises, but by practice.
The Army Has No Name—Only Numbers. And They’re Marching on Hive.
Would you keep doing it—knowing it’s wrong?
Would you keep lying—after being exposed by immutable, on-chain truth?
On Hive.blog, the answer is yes.
Again. And again. And again.
and the Army of ShadowsA new pattern has emerged—one so brazen, so meticulously coordinated, it can no longer be dismissed as coincidence.
Meet
It commands.
Scour its voting history, and you’ll find a chilling rhythm:
But who casts those downvotes?
Look closer.
A squadron of accounts—all created within days or weeks of each other—march in lockstep:
All casting identical -100% votes on the same posts.
All at the exact same time.
All with zero original content.
All holding minimal or no Hive Power of their own—yet somehow wielding full voting mana.
This isn’t organic curation.
This is a voting botnet. A digital militia.
And every single one of these accounts funnels value—directly or indirectly—back to
Consider the evidence:
receives massive delegations from known farming nodes.
, 
, and 
.The timing. The tactics. The targets.
It all points to one conclusion:
This is not a lone actor. This is a node in the same machine.
[ Centralized Exchanges ]
│
↓
@guiltyparties
│
├──→ @gpwallet → @orinoco
├──→ @gpwallet2 → @bdhivesteem
├──→ @gpwallet6 → @huobi-pro
├──→ @whitepower → suppresses dissent → props up @cwow2
└──→ @cwow2 ← 25+ alt accounts cast -100% in unison
This isn’t decentralization.
It’s a centralized influence ring wearing a decentralized mask.
Of course they do.
Thieves always call themselves stewards.
You can say you support mental health while burying creators with -100% downvotes.
You can preach “decentralization” while running a syndicate funded by centralized entities.
You can call critics “delusional” while operating like digital mob bosses.
But remember:
Actions speak louder than any words ever can.
And your actions scream one thing:
Control. Extraction. Illusion.
If you’re reading this on Blurt.blog, you’ve already chosen differently.
Here, there is no downvote button—not because dissent is banned, but because dignity is non-negotiable.
Here, you earn what you create—not what you’re allowed to create.
Here, your voice isn’t judged by who you failed to flatter, but by whether it resonates.
This is your Bitcoin-in-2010 moment.
Early. Raw. Real.
And free.
We’re not here to beg.
We’re here to show.
Follow us everywhere:
To TheMarkyMark, Acidyo, Hurtlocker, Guiltyparties, Cwow2, and your syndicate:
Keep spinning your fictions.
Keep calling critics “mentally ill.”
Keep hiding behind alts and delegations.
But know this:
The ledger is watching.
The exodus is accelerating.
And freedom has already left the building.
Welcome to Blurt.blog—
where your voice stands not because you were permitted to speak,
but because you had the courage to speak truth anyway.
If your hands were stained with the ink of truth,
and every ledger entry screamed your name—
would you still pretend you’re clean?
If the world had seen you—not through rumor, but through immutable data,
through timestamps and token flows that don’t lie—
would you still whisper, “It’s not me”?
Yet on Hive.blog, they do.
The architects of #BuildawhaleFarm—exposed.
The operators of #AcidyoScam—exposed.
The puppeteers behind Hurtlocker, Guiltyparties, and their shell-network of alts—exposed.
Not by gossip.
Not by hearsay.
But by on-chain receipts:
and 
, 
, 
)And while they farm, they downvote.
Not to curate—to control.
To silence the mother who posts her child’s first steps.
To bury the poet who dares speak plainly.
To exile anyone who asks: “Why do only the connected thrive?”
That’s why they’re leaving.
Not quietly. Not grudgingly.
In droves.
They’re migrating to Blurt.blog—not because it’s perfect, but because it’s fair.
Because on Blurt:
No sabotage.
No fear.
Just freedom.
So we ask again:
Would you keep doing something when you know it’s wrong?
When the blockchain has already written your epitaph?
When the exodus has already begun?
Some will.
Because addiction to power blinds even the clearest eyes.
But the rest of us?
We’re already building elsewhere—
on ground that hasn’t been poisoned by farms, fear, and fiction.
Welcome to Blurt.blog.
Where truth doesn’t need armor.
It just needs a voice.
At Bilpcoin, we don’t chase narratives—we follow the chain.
And the chain doesn’t lie.
We’ve already exposed:
Now, we turn to another ghost in the machine: 
: The Silent ConduitFrom its wallet, the pattern is undeniable:
But look closer—and the truth ignites:
This isn’t participation.
It’s a money mule operation.
Funds flow in from 
Why?
To obscure the trail.
To simulate organic activity.
To extract value while appearing harmless.
But the ledger sees all.
[ Centralized Exchanges ]
│
↓
@guiltyparties
│
├──→ @gpwallet → @orinoco
├──→ @gpwallet2 → @bdhivesteem
├──→ @gpwallet6 → @huobi-pro
├──→ @gpwallet7 → @bdhivesteem
└──→ @gpwallet30 → limit orders → @bdhivesteem
This isn’t decentralization.
It’s a centralized laundering ring wearing a decentralized mask.
Of course they do.
Thieves always call themselves stewards.
You can say you support mental health while burying creators with -100% downvotes.
You can preach “decentralization” while running a syndicate funded by centralized entities.
You can call critics “delusional” while operating like digital mob bosses.
But remember:
Actions speak louder than any words ever can.
And your actions scream one thing:
Control. Extraction. Illusion.
If you’re reading this on Blurt.blog, you’ve already chosen differently.
Here, there is no downvote button—not because dissent is banned, but because dignity is non-negotiable.
Here, you earn what you create—not what you’re allowed to create.
Here, your voice isn’t judged by who you failed to flatter, but by whether it resonates.
This is your Bitcoin-in-2010 moment.
Early. Raw. Real.
And free.
We’re not here to beg.
We’re here to show.
Follow us everywhere:
To TheMarkyMark, Acidyo, Hurtlocker, Guiltyparties, and your syndicate:
Keep spinning your fictions.
Keep calling critics “mentally ill.”
Keep hiding behind alts and delegations.
But know this:
The ledger is watching.
The exodus is accelerating.
And freedom has already left the building.
Welcome to Blurt.blog—
where your voice stands not because you were permitted to speak,
but because you had the courage to speak truth anyway.
In the neon-lit, decentralized corridors of the Hive blockchain, where content is currency and reputation is everything, there exists a shadow that looms larger than most. It doesn’t post sunset photos or "gm" threads. It doesn't look for likes. It hunts.
Meet
New data unearthed by the Bilpcoin Hive Tracker AI reveals the staggering scale of this account’s activity. We’re not looking at a few disgruntled clicks. We’re looking at a systematic, high-frequency campaign of economic erasure.
The blockchain doesn’t lie. While users are busy building their "proof of brain,"
In the world of Hive, a downvote isn't just a "dislike." It is a financial strike. It strips rewards, lowers reputation scores, and can effectively bury a user’s voice in the deep, dark vaults of the "low rated" section.
The data shows that
| Target User | Downvote Count | Impact Level |
|---|---|---|
 | 764 | Catastrophic |
 | 172 | Severe |
 | 136 | Significant |
 | 89 | Moderate |
 | 78 | Targeted |
Why does
The most obvious motive is embedded in the name itself.
However, there is a "Gonzo" element to this. Who defines what is "spam"? When one user like
By maintaining a high-frequency downvote presence,
This investigation was made possible through the raw, unfiltered data generated by the Bilpcoin Hive Tracker AI. In a landscape as complex as a layer-1 blockchain, transparency is the only weapon the average user has. The AI's ability to cross-reference voter intent with reward-pool impact is revealing the hidden power dynamics that run Hive.
Is
In the pursuit of a "clean" blockchain, we often trade away the very decentralization we claim to cherish. When a single entity can suppress nearly 2,500 pieces of content with the click of a script, we have to ask: Is this a community, or is it a digital panopticon?
The data is clear. The motive is debatable. But the sting of the
Data Source: Bilpcoin Hive Tracker AI
Tags: #hive #downvotes #blockchain-analysis #bilpcoin #crypto-investigation #decentralization #spaminator
We’ve already exposed:
Now, enter Hurtlocker—the latest ghost in the machine.
And one of his puppet:
: The Silent VaultFrom its wallet, the truth unfolds:
, 
, and crucially—
and .But look at the incoming transfers—and the illusion shatters:
This isn’t organic growth.
It’s internal fund rotation.
It receives—from Hurtlocker, from Huobi withdrawals, from a network of coordinated accounts.
Then it sits—silent, powerful, delegating nothing outward—like a vault waiting to be cashed out.
This is the anatomy of a farm node:
A closed loop. A money circuit. A scam dressed as stewardship.
Of course they do.
Tyrants always claim to love the garden—even as they salt the soil.
You can say you support decentralization while running a delegation cartel.
You can preach “fair rewards” while self-voting your own projects into the top feed.
You can call critics “toxic” while operating like digital mob bosses.
But remember:
Actions speak louder than any words ever can.
And your actions scream one thing:
Extraction. Illusion. Control.
If you’re reading this on Blurt.blog, you’ve already chosen differently.
Here, there is no downvote button—not because dissent is banned, but because dignity is non-negotiable.
Here, you earn what you create—not what you’re allowed to create.
Here, your voice isn’t judged by who you failed to flatter, but by whether it resonates.
This is your Bitcoin-in-2010 moment.
Early. Raw. Real.
And free.
We’re not here to beg.
We’re here to show.
Follow us everywhere:
To TheMarkyMark, Acidyo, Hurtlocker, and your syndicate:
Keep spinning your fictions.
Keep calling critics “mentally ill.”
Keep hiding behind alts and delegations.
But know this:
The ledger is watching.
The exodus is accelerating.
And freedom has already left the building.
Welcome to Blurt.blog—
where your voice stands not because you were permitted to speak,
but because you had the courage to speak truth anyway.
By the Bilpcoin Team
@thefed presents himself as a thought leader:
But behind the carefully written posts lies a strategic node in the
This is not community building.
It’s capital laundering with a byline.
💡 Red Flag:
Despite claiming to “support Hive,”
(off-chain swap broker)
Total cash-outs in 30 days: ~4,700+ HIVE
(~$4,700+ USD) — all moved within 24 hours of powering up.
This is not organic trading.
It’s structured exit.
— “Author share payout”
This is reward farming via proxy—designed to bypass self-vote detection.
graph LR
A[@hurtlocker] -->|Delegation| B[@thefed]
C[@TheMarkyMark] -->|Coordination| A
D[@redditposh] -->|Author Payouts| B
E[@xchangeout / @exchangeme] <--|4,700+ HIVE| B
F[@geneeverett] <--|Off-chain Swaps| B
G[@eds-vote / @coyotelation] <--|4,700 HP Delegation| B
H[@solominer] -->|Mutual Voting| B
I[@jacobtothe] -->|Cartel Alignment| B
offering plausible deniability while enabling mass liquidation.
Imagine a real-time financial heatmap:
, etc.) used to amplify cartel voting
His music posts (“Three Tune Tuesday”) receive 100% votes from 
This is not organic engagement.
It’s orchestrated signal inflation.
While real users are downvoted for truth,
Result?
Hive isn’t failing from silence.
It’s failing from scripted noise.
On Blurt.blog:
Blurt doesn’t need public intellectuals.
It needs real people.
But his wallet tells a different story:
He’s not building Hive. He’s exiting it.
At Bilpcoin, we don’t judge words.
We follow the chain.
And the ledger is clear:
The cartel is cashing out.
The people are waking up.
The future is Blurt.
—
Bilpcoin: We expose the truth. We do not cover it up.
By the Bilpcoin Team
On the surface, @hungrywanderer appears modest:
But beneath this facade lies a critical financial artery in the @TheMarkyMark–
This account is not a creator.
It is a high-frequency cash relay—receiving curation rewards, then funneling hundreds of HIVE directly to 
Now, with surgical precision, we expose its role in Hive’s covert economy.
💡 Red Flag: The only meaningful RC delegation comes from
–22 to downvote truth-tellers. This is not organic support. It’s access control.
Total sent to Huobi: ~295 HIVE (~$300+ USD)
This is not investing.
It’s capital flight—converting farm profits into exchangeable assets.
with memo:
“thanks so much for the loan, I am really grateful sir”
(a known liquidity partner)These are not gifts.
They are profit distributions within a closed loop.
From Jan 2024–Jan 2025,
Yet zero self-posts.
This account only curates—voting 100% on posts from 
This is reward farming, not community building.
graph LR
A[@hurtlocker] -->|6b RC| B[@hungrywanderer]
C[@TheMarkyMark] -->|Indirect control| A
D[@huobi-pro] <--|295+ HIVE| B
E[@bdhivesteem] <--|77+ HIVE| B
F[@abu78] <--|50+ HIVE| B
G[@smartmind20] <--|41b RC| B
H[@HiveWatchers] -->|Funds| C
Imagine a 3D transaction heatmap where:
The graph shows spikes in curation rewards followed by immediate drops—as funds vanish to exchanges.
No accumulation. No reinvestment.
Just throughput.
This is the signature of a financial node, not a community member.
While honest creators post about healthcare, moonkarts, and mindful walking—only to be downvoted for lacking cartel approval—the syndicate:
Result?
Hive isn’t dying from neglect.
It’s being looted from within.
On Blurt.blog:
Blurt’s economy is human-scale, not algorithmic exploitation.
But its transaction history holds the blueprint of Hive’s decay.
At Bilpcoin, we don’t speculate.
We follow the chain.
And the ledger is clear:
Hive’s freedom is a mirage.
Blurt’s freedom is real.
—
Bilpcoin: We expose the truth. We do not cover it up.
hungrywanderer exposed, Hive farming cartel, hurtlocker RC delegation, TheMarkyMark network, BuildAWhaleScam, HiveWatchers fraud, huobi-pro cashout, bdhivesteem wallet, abu78 liquidity, Blurt vs Hive, no downvote social media, blockchain transparency, Bilpcoin investigation, curation farming, silent cash relay.
By the Bilpcoin Team
At first glance, @goldencrow is a ghost:
But in the forensic language of blockchain, emptiness is often the loudest signal.
This account is not dormant.
It is deliberately minimal—a stealth node in the @TheMarkyMark–
We’ve exposed the farms, the alts, the delegators.
Now, we reveal the invisible plumbing—the zero-value accounts that move value without visibility.
💡 Red Flag:
This is not about influence—it’s about enabling transactions without traceability.
From May 25 – Aug 19, 2023, 
This is not farming.
It’s plausible deniability—using a legitimate game ecosystem to mask account activation.
Total sent to
— exactly matching the Dcity inflows.
This is not gifting.
It’s value laundering: move funds through a “clean” game economy, then extract to the cartel.
& 
These are not trades.
They are liquidity conversions—transforming HIVE into stablecoins or other tokens for off-chain cash-out.
graph LR
A[@hurtlocker] -->|6b RC| B[@goldencrow]
C[@dcityfund] -->|Micro-rewards| B
B -->|14.18 HIVE| A
B -->|29.6 HIVE| D[@honey-swap / @hiveswap]
E[@rubilu] <-->|11 HIVE loop| B
F[@TheMarkyMark] -->|Indirect control| A
G[@HiveWatchers] -->|Funds| F
@goldencrow is the smallest node in the network—but its role is strategic:
Imagine a real-time network graph where:
In this model,
But it pulses with high-frequency micro-flows, connecting game economies, cartel wallets, and DEXes.
Zoom into Q3 2023, and you see a burst of 106 tiny inflows → 5 strategic outflows—a classic layering pattern in capital obfuscation.
This is not decentralization.
It’s financial camouflage.
While real creators—mothers, students, artists—are downvoted into silence for posting about hummingbirds or solar panels, the cartel:
Result?
Hive isn’t dying from competition.
It’s being hollowed out from within by invisible hands.
On Blurt.blog:
Blurt’s smallest account has more legitimacy than Hive’s most sophisticated shadow node.
@goldencrow holds $0—but it holds the blueprint of Hive’s decay.
At Bilpcoin, we don’t chase headlines.
We follow the VESTS, no matter how faint.
And the ledger is clear:
Hive’s freedom is a facade. Its economy, a mirage.
But on Blurt.blog?
Freedom is not a feature—it’s the foundation.
—
Bilpcoin: We expose the truth. We do not cover it up.
goldencrow exposed, Hive farming cartel, hurtlocker alt account, TheMarkyMark network, BuildAWhaleScam, HiveWatchers fraud, micro-laundering, dcity SIM rewards, honey-swap DEX, Blurt vs Hive, no downvote social media, blockchain transparency, Bilpcoin investigation, zero-value accounts, Hive shadow economy.
Hive may still have exchanges.
But it has lost its soul.
Blurt has no listings yet—
but it has its covenant:
Freedom is not a privilege for whales. It is the birthright of every voice.
So go.
Before the lights go out completely.
—
Bilpcoin: We don’t reward silence. We amplify truth.
peakd.com/hive-196233/@bpcvoter1/the-buildawhale-farm-scam-chapter-3 #hive vs #blurt #thedarksideofhive #buildawhalescam #itsjustmarky #acidyoscam #acidyofarm #hurtlockerscam #hurtlockerfarm @themarkymark/activities @themarkymark/wallet @buildawhale/wallet @buildawhale/activities @ipromote/activities @ipromote/wallet @usainvote/wallet @usainvote/activities
@hurtlocker/wallet
@hurtlocker/activities
@opinion-voter/wallet
@opinion-voter/activities
@ocdb/wallet
@ocdb/activities
@antiabuse18/activities
@antiabuse18/wallet
@test.ureka/the-untrending-report-hive-downvote-analysis-2025-06-27-20250627213824
@ureka.stats/the-untrending-report-hive-downvote-analysis-16-09-2025-20250916181314
https://www.publish0x.com/@bilpcoinbpc
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbH29p-63eW_PIi4l0KUNLMQ0ageCtkk5
https://www.youtube.com/@bilpcoinbpc
https://www.youtube.com/@bpcaimusic
https://blurt.blog/@bilpcoinbpc/posts
@bilpcoinbpc/bpc-ai-truth-hurts