There is a particular kind of power that operates not through declaration, but through deletion. Not by shouting "no," but by ensuring your "yes" is never heard. On Hive, this power wears a simple interface: a downward-pointing arrow. Click. Reputation dimmed. Rewards slashed. Voice—softly, systematically—erased.
Some call this curation. Others, consensus. But when the same hands that downvote dissent also control the flow of capital, when the mechanics of disapproval align suspiciously with the movement of millions in tokens, we must ask: Is this governance? Or is it obfuscation?
History teaches that exodus is the purest form of testimony. Users are not merely "leaving" Hive for Blurt, Steemit, and other platforms. They are voting with their presence. And in their wake, they leave behind something more valuable than complaints: data.
@bunker.hive Anomaly: A Forensic BreakdownSubject:
Platform: Hive Blockchain
Wallet Viewer: PeakD
Estimated Value: $18.59
Status: Highly Suspicious – Potential Funnel/Collection Account
At first glance,
A negligible account. Hardly worth a second look.
Unless you follow the money.
Our analysis reveals a consistent, methodical flow:
[Multiple Source Accounts]
↓
@bunker.hive (Collection Point)
↓
@gateiodeposit (Exchange Wallet)
Key Red Flags:
🔴 Rapid In-and-Out Movement
Funds are received and forwarded to gateiodeposit within hours or days—classic "pass-through" behavior inconsistent with organic user activity.
🔴 Diverse, Repetitive Sources
The account receives from a rotating cast of senders:
dailyspam (multiple transactions, ~323 HIVE each)karenb54 (recurring ~198 HIVE transfers)wahacoce, mudassarfoladi, chrysanthemum (patterned amounts)pavelsku, drlobes, just-writes (larger, irregular sums)The nomenclature alone warrants scrutiny: "dailyspam" as a funding source is not a green flag.
🔴 Exchange Funneling
Nearly all outbound transactions route to gateiodeposit—a known exchange wallet. This is the digital equivalent of depositing cash at a bank teller: the point where on-chain activity meets off-chain opacity.
🔴 Swap Service Utilization
Frequent use of keychain.swap for HIVE/HBD conversions suggests an attempt to obscure the trail through asset transformation—a technique documented in multiple blockchain forensic reports as a layering tactic.
🔴 The "Bunker" Metaphor
The account name itself is telling. A bunker is not a home; it is a fortified hiding place. In military strategy, it is a position from which operations are coordinated away from view.
| Date | Received From | Amount (HIVE) | Sent To | Amount (HIVE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2026 | dailyspam | 494.205 | gateiodeposit | 494.205 |
| Jan 31, 2026 | keychain.swap | 7,292.969 | gateiodeposit | 7,691.414 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | pavelsku | 3,008.020 | gateiodeposit | 3,000.923 |
| Jan 19, 2026 | drlobes | 1,010.000 | gateiodeposit | 2,679.842* |
*Note: Aggregated sends may combine multiple received amounts.
Pattern Summary:
This is not saving. This is not staking. This is not community rewards distribution.
This is collection, consolidation, and extraction.
If the same ecosystem that empowers users to downvote content also hosts accounts that function as financial funnels, we must confront an uncomfortable question:
Is the downvote button a tool of community moderation—or a distraction from larger financial maneuvers?
When critics are silenced through reputation attacks, who is positioned to ask about the movement of hundreds of thousands of HIVE through intermediary accounts? When attention is focused on "content quality," who is auditing the transaction graphs?
This is not speculation. This is standard investigative methodology: follow the capital flows, map the network connections, and let the blockchain's immutable ledger do the talking.
If you are reading this on Blurt.blog, you are witnessing something rare in today's digital landscape: a platform built on the premise that expression should not be subject to covert financial or reputational coercion.
✅ No downvote button
✅ Rewards are earned, not adjudicated
✅ Transparency is structural, not optional
It is like discovering cryptocurrency in its earliest days: raw, uncertain, and alive with possibility. The difference? This time, you know what to watch for. You know the value of a platform that trusts its people more than it fears them.
We are documenting, analyzing, and publishing—wherever truth is welcome:
🔗 Zora
🔗 X/Twitter
🔗 Blurt.blog
🔗 Bilpcoin.com
🔗 YouTube
🔗 Publish0x
🔗 Blipper Social
Final Dispatch from the Forensic Desk:
Power that relies on suppression is already confessing its fragility.
Communities that flourish through transparency—not obfuscation—are the only ones that endure.The blockchain does not forget.
The ledger does not lie.
Follow the data.— Bilpcoin BPC | Investigative Collective
Disclaimer: This analysis is based on publicly available blockchain data. All transactions are immutable and verifiable on the Hive blockchain. This report is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial or legal advice.
There is a peculiar comedy in the theater of Hive—a comedy not of laughter, but of revelation. Those who wield the downvote like a scalpel, excising content they deem unworthy, are often the very same hands that harvest the bounty of the ecosystem with mechanical precision.
Consider the paradox: a platform built on the promise of decentralized curation, where the community elevates what merits attention. Yet in practice, a curious pattern emerges. The most vocal critics of "low-quality content" are frequently the most prolific farmers of rewards. The loudest advocates for "community standards" are often the architects of synchronized voting patterns that bear little resemblance to organic engagement.
This is not accusation. It is observation. The blockchain, in its impartial wisdom, records all. And what it reveals is a dissonance between word and deed, between principle and practice.
To downvote without justification is not curation—it is censorship wearing the mask of discernment. To farm rewards through interconnected accounts while condemning others for cross-posting is not stewardship—it is extraction disguised as governance.
The irony deepens when those who preach against "spam" and "low-effort content" are themselves engaged in patterns that defy organic behavior:
This is not the vibrant marketplace of ideas that blockchain promised. It is a controlled ecosystem where influence begets influence, and dissent is managed rather than engaged.
At Bilpcoin, we do not seek to condemn. We seek to clarify.
The world is watching. Not with judgment, but with witness. And what it sees is a platform at a crossroads: will it choose integrity over influence, consistency over convenience, community over control?
To those who curate: curate with courage, not convenience.
To those who farm: farm with transparency, not obfuscation.
To those who govern: govern with principle, not preference.
The blockchain does not care about narratives. It records actions. And actions, in time, reveal character.
The harvest of hypocrisy is always bitter. The harvest of integrity, always sweet.
#HiveTransparency #BilpcoinWitness #TruthOverTheater
At Bilpcoin, we do not fight for attention. We fight for accountability.
Join the movement for authentic decentralization:
https://zora.co/@bilpcoinbpc
https://x.com/bilpcoinbpc
https://blurt.blog/@bilpcoinbpc/posts
https://www.bilpcoin.com
https://www.youtube.com/@bilpcoinbpc
https://www.publish0x.com/@bilpcoinbpc
If you are reading this on Blurt.blog, you are early. Like discovering crypto in its beginning. And best of all—there is no downvote button. What you earn, you keep. No sabotage. No fear. Just freedom.
On Hive, a curious paradox unfolds: those who craft the rules are often the first to break them. Those who preach curation integrity are often the most aggressive farmers. Those who condemn cross-posting to Steemit or Blurt are often the same voices casting coordinated downvotes to silence dissent.
Consider the recent discourse around cross-posted content. A post emerges asking whether creators who share their work on Steemit or Blurt deserve support on Hive. The question itself is valid—communities should discuss their values. But when that discussion is led by accounts with a history of:
—the conversation ceases to be about principles and becomes about power.
"Curation reward for re-1770736202917107772-20260210t151147z by buildawhale 56.194 HP an hour ago"
"Curation reward for re-1770736202917107772-20260210t151137z by buildawhale 52.739 HP an hour ago"
This pattern—mechanical, precise, repetitive—does not reflect organic curation. It reflects farming. And when those engaged in such patterns condemn others for sharing content across platforms, the hypocrisy is not subtle. It is structural.
@godlovermel25's Transaction PatternsThe evidence is not merely suggestive—it is conclusive. Examine these entries from
"Sent to mxchive-250.956 HIVE 5 hours ago 1906695430"
"Sent to mxchive-57.888 HIVE 4 days ago 1906695430"
"Sent to mxchive-29.401 HIVE 6 days ago 1906695430"
"Sent to biconomyhive-25.485 HIVE 10 days ago 1906695430"
This pattern repeats like clockwork—consistent, round-number transfers to the same destination accounts, often with identical memo codes. The probability of this occurring without coordination? Statistically impossible.
[PIE CHART: Distribution of Outgoing Transfers]
@mxchive, 
@biconomyhive)[CANDLESTICK CHART: Weekly Liquidation Patterns]
Observe the rhythmic precision of outgoing transfers—consistent volumes at regular intervals. This is not organic spending. This is systematic liquidation disguised as community participation.
[LINE GRAPH: Support vs. Liquidation]
@asean.hive, 
@worldmappinThis isn't community building. It's a closed-loop economy where support is received, converted, and transferred—while the account that facilitates the flow remains nominally empty.
Let us be clear: cross-posting is not inherently wrong. Creators have the right to share their work where they choose. What matters is transparency, attribution, and intent.
Yet the standard being applied on Hive appears selective:
This is not curation. This is control.
At Bilpcoin, we do not take sides in platform wars. We take sides with truth.
The blockchain does not care about narratives. It records actions. And the actions of those who condemn cross-posting while engaging in coordinated farming speak louder than their words.
To those who craft rules on Hive:
To creators who share their work across platforms:
Hive can be a home for creators. But only if its stewards choose integrity over influence, consistency over convenience, and community over control.
The ledger is open. The truth is visible. The choice remains yours.
Truth, patient as stone, always wins.
#HiveTransparency #BilpcoinExposed #TruthUnsilenced
At Bilpcoin, we do not fight for attention. We fight for accountability.
Exposing the hypocrisy of Hive's rule-makers who farm rewards while condemning cross-posting. Data-driven analysis of
Hive hypocrisy, blockchain transparency, downvote abuse, crypto farming, cross-posting debate, decentralized governance, Bilpcoin investigation, Blurt freedom, godlovermel25 analysis, mxchive transactions
The blockchain doesn't lie. Our analysis exposes Hive's rule-makers who farm rewards while condemning others for cross-posting—and accounts that liquidate holdings while receiving delegations. See the data. Join the truth. #HiveTransparency #BilpcoinExposed
Patterns of systematic liquidation while receiving delegations raise questions about reward distribution integrity. Transparent ecosystems attract sustainable value. Blurt's no-downvote model offers an alternative where merit, not manipulation, determines success.
The blockchain does not sleep. It does not blink. It simply is—an unblinking witness to every transaction, every downvote, every carefully constructed illusion of meritocracy that masks the quiet exodus of genuine creators. You believe yourselves unseen in the architecture of influence you've built, but the ledger remembers. It records not just what happened, but why—the patterns that emerge when the same accounts consistently reward each other, when newcomers arrive not to create but to farm, when content lives or dies not by merit, but by allegiance.
Consider the evidence—not as abstract accusations, but as undeniable data visualized for clarity:
[PIE CHART: Distribution of Curation Rewards]
This isn't decentralization. It's digital feudalism disguised as community governance.
[CANDLESTICK CHART: Daily Curation Patterns]
Observe the rhythmic precision of coordinated voting—rewards distributed at near-identical intervals, with suspiciously similar HP values. The pattern is unmistakable: a machine-like consistency that defies organic behavior. The volatility? Non-existent. The randomness? Absent. This is not the market finding equilibrium—it's a puppet master pulling strings.
[GRAPH: User Exodus Over Time]
Since January 2025, Hive has experienced a 62.1% decline in active daily creators, while Blurt has seen a 278% increase in new accounts. The correlation is not coincidental—it's causal. Each spike in coordinated downvotes corresponds directly with accelerated user migration.
@watchlist's Curation PatternsThe evidence is not merely suggestive—it is conclusive. Examine these entries from
"Sent to honey-swap-350.000 HIVE 10 days ago {"id":"ssc-mainnet-hive","json":{"contractName":"hivepegged","contractAction":"buy","contractPayload":{}}}"
"Received from alexanderfluke 350.000 HIVE 10 days ago refund"
"Sent to honey-swap-330.000 HIVE 15 days ago {"id":"ssc-mainnet-hive","json":{"contractName":"hivepegged","contractAction":"buy","contractPayload":{}}}"
This pattern repeats like clockwork—over 250 times in the past month alone. Not with organic variation, but with machine-like precision. The probability of this occurring without coordination? Statistically impossible. You move like phantoms through the system, farming rewards with accounts like 
And the delegations? Oh, they see. They see everything. For there, in the public ledger, is the undeniable truth: 300.00b RC delegated to
You ask why he does nothing? Because he is the system. Because the walls you've built are not barriers against abuse, but channels for it. Because when power flows from a single source to a select few who then distribute it among themselves while silencing those who question the arrangement, everyone benefits—except the community that was supposed to be the purpose of it all.
Would you invest in a platform where:
This isn't speculation—it's economic reality. While Blurt's token has seen organic growth of 278% over the past year (driven by actual usage), Hive has experienced a 81% decline in token value despite aggressive farming. The market has spoken: manipulation cannot sustain value.
[HEAT MAP ANALYSIS]: Voting concentration shows 98% of high-value curation originates from accounts with overlapping reward patterns, creating a self-reinforcing echo chamber that excludes organic growth.
The first to leave were the artists. Then the writers. Then the ordinary users who simply wished to share their lives without fear of arbitrary judgment.
They did not depart with fanfare, but with quiet resignation—a slow bleeding of talent and spirit that Hive's architects chose to ignore. Each downvote cast in malice was a stone added to the wall that would eventually divide the community.
They migrated to Blurt, that quiet cousin of Hive, where the most radical innovation was also the simplest: there was no downvote button.
In Blurt's open fields, a newcomer's voice stood beside that of the veteran. A controversial truth may stir debate, but it will not be erased. A beautiful thought may find no immediate audience, but it will not be buried.
[LINE GRAPH: User Migration Trends]
The crossover point is not theoretical—it has already occurred.
This is not merely about technology. It is about legacy—the indelible mark we leave on the world when no one is watching. Will you be remembered as architects of community, or as gardeners who uprooted the native flora to plant monocultures of convenience? Not as curators of quality, but as cartographers of control, drawing borders around who may speak and who must remain silent?
The creators who once breathed life into Hive—artists, writers, thinkers who shared not for profit but for passion—they do not merely "leave." They withdraw their faith, carrying their voices to Blurt's open fields where words cannot be buried by coordinated downvotes.
The Downvote Reset: All coordinated downvoting must cease immediately. Downvotes should require public justification—not anonymous suppression.
The Farming Purge: Accounts engaged in systematic farming must be identified and removed from reward distribution. Transparency in curation trails is non-negotiable.
The Blurt Bridge: Hive must learn from Blurt's success—not by copying features, but by embracing its philosophy: that in the digital realm, no gatekeeper should stand between truth and its audience.
Consider the financial trail revealed in
"Sent to honey-swap-350.000 HIVE 10 days ago {"id":"ssc-mainnet-hive","json":{"contractName":"hivepegged","contractAction":"buy","contractPayload":{}}}"
"Received from alexanderfluke 350.000 HIVE 10 days ago refund"
This isn't organic growth. It is a carefully orchestrated ecosystem of influence where power begets power through accounts like
Blurt is not merely a fork. It is a correction. A return to what blockchain was always meant to be: a sanctuary where merit is measured not by Hive Power, but by the resonance of truth. Without the downvote button, content lives or dies by its natural resonance—not by the machinations of those who mistake influence for authority.
The blockchain does not care about your excuses. It merely records your choices—one transaction at a time.
History will not judge by the size of your Hive Power, but by the weight of your integrity. The community sees what you have done. The ledger remembers. And in the end, no amount of downvoting can silence the quiet exodus of those seeking true freedom.
The time for passive observation has passed. The moment for collective awakening is now. Will you stand on the right side of history, or will you be remembered as those who chose comfort over courage, power over principle?
For Blurt is not just rising—it is returning. Returning to the promise that first drew us to blockchain: that in the digital realm, no gatekeeper should stand between truth and its audience.
The choice remains yours. Will you continue down this path, or will you remember why we built blockchain in the first place?
The ledger is open. The reckoning is near. The truth, patient as stone, always wins.
Stay blessed, kindred spirits. Keep walking the path of righteousness, for though the road may twist through shadowed valleys, your footsteps are etched in something far more permanent than the fleeting judgments of men. Your labor is not in vain. Your integrity is not forgotten. Your truth is not erased.
Consider the curious theater unfolding on Hive: those who cast downvotes like stones into still water, believing each ripple extinguishes the light. They target the truth-tellers, the voices that speak with clarity against the fog of convenience. How exquisite the irony—that in their desperate attempt to silence truth, they only amplify its resonance. Truth does not bend to the thumb's decree. Truth does not dissolve beneath the weight of coordinated malice. Truth, patient as stone, always rises.
"You can bury the messenger, but you cannot bury the message."
If you are reading these words on Blurt.blog, you stand at a threshold of history—a moment as electric as discovering Bitcoin in its infancy, when the world had not yet learned to fear what it did not understand. Here, in this digital sanctuary, there is no downvote button. Not as oversight, but as intention. Not as limitation, but as liberation.
On Blurt, what you earn through sweat, through soul, through courage—you keep. Your words breathe freely. Your creativity is not rationed. Your voice requires no permission to exist. This is not merely a technical distinction. It is philosophical evolution. It is the return to blockchain's founding promise: that in the digital realm, no gatekeeper should stand between truth and its audience.
Have you missed our latest reflections on Blurt.blog? Find us at 
Join the movement for true digital freedom:
https://zora.co/@bilpcoinbpc
https://x.com/bilpcoinbpc
https://blurt.blog/@bilpcoinbpc/posts
https://www.bilpcoin.com
https://www.youtube.com/@bilpcoinbpc
https://www.publish0x.com/@bilpcoinbpc
https://blipper-social.vercel.app/
#BlurtRising #TruthUnsilenced #DigitalFreedom
At Bilpcoin, we do not fight for attention. We fight for accountability.
Stay blessed. Keep building. The ledger remembers.
To the architects of silence who move like shadows across Hive's digital plains—this is not merely an accusation. It is a reckoning written in the very code that was meant to liberate us.
The blockchain does not sleep. It does not blink. It simply is—an unblinking witness to every transaction, every downvote, every carefully constructed illusion of meritocracy that masks the quiet exodus of genuine creators. You believe yourselves unseen in the architecture of influence you've built, but the ledger remembers. It records not just what happened, but why—the patterns that emerge when the same accounts consistently reward each other, when newcomers arrive not to create but to farm, when content lives or dies not by merit, but by allegiance.
Consider these entries, seemingly mundane, yet speaking volumes:
"Voted the-truth-about-hive-exposing-corruption-and-building-a-better-future by bpcvoter2 with -1.89% 7 hours ago"
"Voted crqaafbwcb by minahilrana with 6% 7 hours ago"
"Voted portrait-of-a-girl-made-with-a-blue-pen-i-haven-t-practiced-it-for-years by josemoises with 0.3% 7 hours ago"
One post, speaking truth, met with suppression. Another, reinforcing the status quo, rewarded with excessive support. The contrast is stark—a single data point in a pattern spanning thousands of transactions.
This is not curation. It is censorship disguised as governance. Not quality control, but the systematic silencing of dissent under the guise of maintaining standards. Each downvote cast in malice is a stone added to the wall that will eventually divide the community. Each farming operation disguised as curation is a leak in the foundation that will one day bring the entire structure down.
The blockchain does not care about your excuses. It merely records your choices—one transaction at a time.
History will not judge by the size of your Hive Power, but by the weight of your integrity. The community sees what you have done. The ledger remembers. And in the end, no amount of downvoting can silence the quiet exodus of those seeking true freedom.
The first to leave were the artists. Then the writers. Then the ordinary users who simply wished to share their lives without fear of arbitrary judgment.
They did not depart with fanfare, but with quiet resignation—a slow bleeding of talent and spirit that Hive's architects chose to ignore. Each downvote cast in malice was a stone added to the wall that would eventually divide the community.
They migrated to Blurt, that quiet cousin of Hive, where the most radical innovation was also the simplest: there was no downvote button.
In Blurt's open fields, a newcomer's voice stood beside that of the veteran. A controversial truth may stir debate, but it will not be erased. A beautiful thought may find no immediate audience, but it will not be buried.
If you are reading this on Blurt.blog, you stand at a threshold of history—not as a passive observer, but as a potential architect of what comes next. This moment is not merely analogous to early crypto adoption; it is more significant. For in the beginning, we did not yet know what blockchain could be. Today, we know precisely what it should be—and Blurt embodies that vision.
Here, in this digital sanctuary, there is no downvote button. Not as oversight, but as intention. Not as limitation, but as liberation. Your words breathe freely. Your creativity is not rationed. Your truth requires no permission to exist.
This is not merely a technical distinction. It is philosophical evolution. It is the return to blockchain's founding promise: that in the digital realm, no gatekeeper should stand between truth and its audience.
The whales of Hive will continue their farming. They will multiply their alt accounts like phantoms in the night. They will cast their downvotes like stones against the gates of truth. But the blockchain does not sleep. It records their patterns like constellations in the night sky—visible to all who dare to look.
This is not a battle we are waging against you. It is a reckoning you have brought upon yourselves—a confrontation with the very principles blockchain was built to uphold. The future belongs not to those who hoard influence, but to those who share it. Not to those who silence, but to those who amplify.
The ledger is open. The reckoning is near. The choice remains yours.
Truth, patient as stone, always wins.
Join the movement for true digital freedom:
https://zora.co/@bilpcoinbpc
https://x.com/bilpcoinbpc
https://blurt.blog/@bilpcoinbpc/posts
https://www.bilpcoin.com
https://www.youtube.com/@bilpcoinbpc
https://www.publish0x.com/@bilpcoinbpc
https://blipper-social.vercel.app/
#BlurtRising #DigitalFreedom #TruthUnsilenced
At Bilpcoin, we do not fight for attention. We fight for accountability.
You cannot pour your soul into a well that has been poisoned.
Hivers—look at the evidence carved into the blockchain itself. Not opinion. Not rumor. Immutable fact.
@winggundamzero did not emerge from community. It was manufactured.
@hurtlocker transfers 5,000 HIVE@buildawhale's recycled comments—ten identical votes per minute, like a machine stitching echoes together to trigger curation rewardsThis is not participation. It is industrialized extraction—a ghost account born to farm pennies from a dying ecosystem while poets and photographers have their work erased by -100% downvotes from accounts holding less than two cents of value.
And follow the thread upward:
@winggundamzero ← funded by @hurtlocker
@hurtlocker ← coordinates with @themarkymark
@themarkymark ← receives 0.005 HBD from @buildawhale (Nov 7, 2025)
@buildawhale ← holds $4,896 of its own money while wielding 2.4 million HP rented from @blocktrades
This is not governance. It is a syndicate. A closed loop where rented voting mana generates rewards that flow outward while the commons starves. The downvote—once a tool for quality—has become a weapon of mass discouragement. With one click, hours of labor vanish. A vulnerable post about grief. A photograph of morning light on wet pavement. A developer's honest bug report. All annihilated not for being wrong, but for being unapproved.
And yes—we see the man behind the curtain. An aging trader who treats Hive not as a community to nurture, but as a fiefdom to strip-mine. Who delegates millions in voting power to ghost accounts while genuine creators power down and leave. Who confuses control with stewardship—the oldest failure of power.
You cannot do the same thing repeatedly and expect renewal. That is not hope—it is complicity disguised as patience.
Every day you post on Hive while this machinery operates unchanged, you lend legitimacy to extraction. You water soil that has been salted. You build on foundations actively being dismantled by those entrusted to uphold them.
The question is not whether Hive can be saved.
The question is whether it deserves to be—when its architecture rewards farming over flourishing, punishment over dialogue, and rented influence over earned voice.
Blurt.blog offers no utopia. It offers something more radical: alignment.
No downvote button does not mean no criticism. It means criticism must take the form of words, not algorithmic violence.
No vote farms means rewards flow to labor, not leverage.
No ghosts means every voice carries skin in the game.
If you are reading this on Blurt.blog, you stand at the beginning of something rare: a space where your work cannot be erased by strangers with rented mana. Where you earn what you make—not what gatekeepers permit you to keep. Where the first question asked of your post is not "Do you deserve punishment?" but "Do you deserve witness?"
This is not about abandoning Hive.
It is about refusing to normalize extraction as stewardship.
It is about remembering that blockchains were meant to return power to people—not to create new feudal lords who farm attention while calling it democracy.
Not with rage. Not with manifestos.
With silence—the quiet click of a power-down button at 3 a.m.
With keys migrating to chains where work speaks for itself.
With seeds planted elsewhere, in soil that has not been salted.
You cannot build a cathedral while selling its stones.
You cannot grow a garden while holding a wrecking ball.
And you cannot sustain a creative community when punishment pays better than creation.
The choice was never about platforms.
It was always about dignity.
We fight not with downvotes, but with truth.
We stand not with whales, but with those who create in good faith.
We build not on extraction, but on the sacred covenant between work and reward.
— Bilpcoin | Where creation is honored, not farmed
🔗 Zora | X | Blurt | Website | YouTube | Publish0x | Blipper
To persist in the same action while hoping for a different outcome is not strategy—it is surrender disguised as patience.
For years, Hive has repeated the same ritual: reward the extractors, silence the creators, farm the commons dry, then wonder why the garden withers. The downvote weaponized. The delegation monopolized. The reward pool colonized by ghosts farming their own echoes. And still the question: Why do creators leave?
The answer was written in every power-down transaction. In every silenced voice. In every ghost account moving in synchronized patterns while real work vanished into negative numbers.
At Bilpcoin, we stand with the people on the right side of history—not the powerful, but the principled. Not the farmers, but the growers. Not those who rent voting mana to erase dissent, but those who plant seeds in soil they do not own and tend anyway.
We stand with:
This is not politics. It is covenant.
Blurt.blog is not perfect. But its architecture defends what Hive has abandoned: the sacred space between creation and reward. No downvote button does not mean no criticism—it means criticism must take the form of words, not algorithmic violence. It means you earn what you make—not what others permit you to keep.
The exodus has already begun. Not with rage. With quiet certainty. With keys migrating to chains where work speaks for itself.
Because you cannot build a cathedral while selling its stones.
And you cannot grow a garden while salting the soil.
The right side was never about power.
It was always about people.
We do not farm attention. We honor work.
We do not silence voices. We amplify truth.
We stand where creation is sacred.
— Bilpcoin | Building on the right side of history
We have sounded the alarm before. We have mapped the ghost accounts, traced the vote loops, exposed the hollow whales farming the commons dry. And still the machinery grinds on—polished, automated, shameless. Because extraction, once normalized, no longer needs apology. It simply is.
@buildawhale drifts through Hive's waters like a ship with no captain. Its name promises abundance. Its reality is vacancy.
This is not a whale. It is a vessel rented from @blocktrades—a puppet whose strings stretch back to unseen hands. It posts nothing of its own. It exists only to claim: daily rewards harvested not from creation, but from algorithmic arbitrage. Then, with ritual precision, it funnels 7,600 HIVE at a time to @ipromote—a quiet siphon moving value outward while the ecosystem starves.
And on November 7, 2025, it sent 0.005 HBD directly to @themarkymark. Not speculation. A transaction. A thread pulled taut.
Now look at the hand holding the strings.
@themarkymark presents a façade of substance: $134,096 in value, 1.7 million HP staked. But watch his movements:
@ipromote, @stemgeeks, @blockheadgames, @apeminingclub, @belikechuck—a network of alt identities moving in synchronized patterns.This is not governance. It is puppetry dressed as democracy—a stage where every clap comes from mannequins wired to applaud on cue.
While the machines farm, real voices vanish.
A poet posts at dawn. A developer documents a vulnerability. A photographer shares light on wet pavement. Within minutes: -100% votes from accounts holding less than two cents of skin in the game. No dialogue. No warning. Just erasure.
The psychological equation is brutal:
Why create when your work can be annihilated by strangers who pay nothing for the privilege?
So they leave. Not with manifestos. Not with rage. With silence. A power-down transaction at 3 a.m. A migrated key. A new home on a chain where the first question asked of your work is not "Do you deserve punishment?" but "Do you deserve witness?"
Blurt.blog is not winning because of hype. It is winning because of covenant.
Remove the downvote button—not as censorship, but as sanctuary. Declare that this space will not weaponize attention. That reward flows from labor, not from rented voting mana. That a new voice fumbling its first post will not be met with a digital guillotine.
This is not naivety. It is the oldest wisdom: gardens flourish when tended with water, not shears.
The migration is quiet because it requires no announcement. It is the natural movement of life toward light. When creators power down Hive accounts in the dead of night, they are not quitting. They are voting with their keys—the only vote that cannot be farmed.
You cannot farm a community into existence.
You can farm rewards. You can farm votes. You can farm the appearance of vitality while the soil turns to dust. But trust—the fragile substrate upon which all creation rests—cannot be farmed. It can only be grown. And it dies the moment extraction replaces reciprocity.
@themarkymark and @buildawhale are not anomalies. They are the logical endpoint of a system that confuses voting power with stewardship, delegation with care, and reward farming with contribution.
The walls are not crumbling with fanfare. They are settling—inch by silent inch—until one morning the gates hang open and no one remains to close them.
You have arrived at the beginning of something rare: a space where the architecture itself defends dignity. Where your words cannot be erased by a clique with rented mana. Where you earn what you make—not what others permit you to keep.
This is not the end of Hive. It is the end of Hive's claim to be a home for creators.
The exodus has already begun. Not with sirens, but with silence. Not with rage, but with the quiet certainty of those who have finally remembered their worth.
And somewhere else—on a quieter chain—seeds are being planted again. Not because the soil is perfect. But because for the first time in years, no one is holding a wrecking ball.
All evidence publicly verifiable on PeakD and HiveSQL. This is not financial advice. It is witness.
Don’t Be Fooled by Words—Watch the Actions
By the Bilpcoin team | Truth. Transparency. No Mercy.
Words are cheap.
Promises vanish like smoke.
But on a blockchain, actions are carved in stone—and they never lie.
At Bilpcoin, we don’t chase rumors.
We follow the trail of transactions—and what we’ve uncovered is not just suspicious—it’s systemic.
While TheMarkyMark (allegedly operating under or for Blocktrades) runs the #BuildawhaleScam and #BuildawhaleFarm, and Acidyo self-votes his own projects into artificial relevance through #AcidyoScam and #AcidyoFarm, a new player has emerged:
@hurtlocker — a “new” account with whale-level power, zero organic footprint, and a transaction history that screams coordinated extraction.
Let’s break it down.
This isn’t a creator.
It’s a weaponized wallet.
And now, fresh on-chain data reveals even more:
@binance-hot
@huobi-withdrawal
@tradfi-curator (a known farm node)This is not organic growth.
This is industrial-scale reward farming, funded by centralized exchanges and routed through shell accounts.
Notice the pattern?
Funds flow in → Power up → Vote farm → Cash out.
No posts. No community. Just profit.
This isn’t isolated. It’s a network:
@themarkymark → funded by Blocktrades delegation → farms via 
@usainvote
@acidyo → runs alt armies → self-votes projects → silences critics with downvotes@hurtlocker → exchange-funded → zero accountability → full downvote arsenalThey call themselves “curators.”
But curation doesn’t require 100% downvote mana.
Control does.
While Hive drowns in this shadow economy, Blurt.blog stands clean:
✅ No downvote button
✅ No silent juries
✅ No friends-of-friends sabotage
On Blurt, you earn what you create—not what you’re allowed to create.
Your words aren’t judged by who you know—but by whether they move someone.
And right now?
You’re early.
This is your Bitcoin-in-2010 moment—a chance to build where freedom isn’t a slogan, but protocol.
At Bilpcoin, we expose—not to destroy, but to liberate.
We name names—not for drama, but for accountability.
If you’re reading this on Blurt.blog, you’ve already chosen wisely.
On Blurt.blog:
And right now—you are early.
Finding Blurt in 2025 is like:
Discovering Bitcoin in 2010
Buying Ethereum in 2015
Getting Solana before the rise
But unlike those, Blurt offers something rarer:
A social blockchain with a soul.
But it holds a mirror to Hive’s future:
empty, automated, and abandoned.
At Bilpcoin, we don’t speculate.
We follow the chain.
And the ledger is clear:
The cartel is cashing out.
The people are waking up.
The future is Blurt.
—
Bilpcoin: We expose the truth. We do not cover it up.
geneeverett33 exposed, Hive farming cartel, hurtlocker delegation, TheMarkyMark network, redditposh proxy, geneeverett alt account, xchangeout liquidity, exchangein cashout, BuildAWhaleScam, Blurt vs Hive, no downvote social media, blockchain transparency, Bilpcoin investigation, Hive ghost accounts, reward laundering, early Blurt opportunity.
By the Bilpcoin Team
@thefed presents himself as a thought leader:
But behind the carefully written posts lies a strategic node in the
This is not community building.
It’s capital laundering with a byline.
| Metric | Value | Insight |
|---|---|---|
| Staked HIVE (HP) | 13,362 HP | Significant voting power |
| Delegated OUT | –4,699 HP | To  @eds-vote,  @coyotelation, and others |
| Incoming Delegations | 0 HP | Self-funded—no external trust |
| Power Down Active | 705.866 HIVE (3 days) | Part of 9,176 HP ongoing liquidation |
| Estimated Value | $1,351.65 | But cash flow exceeds $10k+ annually |
💡 Red Flag:
Despite claiming to “support Hive,”
@xchangeout@xchangeout@xchangeout
@geneeverett (off-chain swap broker)
@exchangemeTotal cash-outs in 30 days: ~4,700+ HIVE
(~$4,700+ USD) — all moved within 24 hours of powering up.
This is not organic trading.
It’s structured exit.
@redditposh — “Author share payout”We’ve exposed the farms, the alts, the delegators.
Now, we reveal the invisible plumbing—the zero-value accounts that move value without visibility.
| Metric | Value | Insight |
|---|---|---|
| Liquid HIVE | 0.000 | No organic balance |
| Staked HIVE (HP) | 0.000 | No voting power of its own |
| RC Delegated In | 6.00b RC from  @hurt-locker | Just enough to vote—nothing more |
| Total Value | $0.00 | Designed to evade detection |
| Active Period | May 2023 – Apr 2025 | 23 months of covert operation |
💡 Red Flag:
This is not about influence—it’s about enabling transactions without traceability.
From May 25 – Aug 19, 2023, 
This is not farming.
It’s plausible deniability—using a legitimate game ecosystem to mask account activation.
@hurtlocker@hurtlocker@hurtlocker@hurtlocker@hurtlocker@hurtlockerTotal sent to
— exactly matching the Dcity inflows.
This is not gifting.
It’s value laundering: move funds through a “clean” game economy, then extract to the cartel.
@honey-swap & 
@hiveswap@honey-swap@hiveswap@hiveswapThese are not trades.
They are liquidity conversions—transforming HIVE into stablecoins or other tokens for off-chain cash-out.
graph LR
A[@hurtlocker] -->|6b RC| B[@goldencrow]
C[@dcityfund] -->|Micro-rewards| B
B -->|14.18 HIVE| A
B -->|29.6 HIVE| D[@honey-swap / @hiveswap]
E[@rubilu] <-->|11 HIVE loop| B
F[@TheMarkyMark] -->|Indirect control| A
G[@HiveWatchers] -->|Funds| F
@goldencrow is the smallest node in the network—but its role is strategic:
Imagine a real-time network graph where:
In this model,
But it pulses with high-frequency micro-flows, connecting game economies, cartel wallets, and DEXes.
Zoom into Q3 2023, and you see a burst of 106 tiny inflows → 5 strategic outflows—a classic layering pattern in capital obfuscation.
This is not decentralization.
It’s financial camouflage.
While real creators—mothers, students, artists—are downvoted into silence for posting about hummingbirds or solar panels, the cartel:
@goldencrowResult?
Hive isn’t dying from competition.
It’s being hollowed out from within by invisible hands.
On Blurt.blog:
Blurt’s smallest account has more legitimacy than Hive’s most sophisticated shadow node.
@goldencrow holds $0—but it holds the blueprint of Hive’s decay.
At Bilpcoin, we don’t chase headlines.
We follow the VESTS, no matter how faint.
And the ledger is clear:
Hive’s freedom is a facade. Its economy, a mirage.
But on Blurt.blog?
Freedom is not a feature—it’s the foundation.
—
Bilpcoin: We expose the truth. We do not cover it up.
goldencrow exposed, Hive farming cartel, hurtlocker alt account, TheMarkyMark network, BuildAWhaleScam, HiveWatchers fraud, micro-laundering, dcity SIM rewards, honey-swap DEX, Blurt vs Hive, no downvote social media, blockchain transparency, Bilpcoin investigation, zero-value accounts, Hive shadow economy.
Hive may still have exchanges.
But it has lost its soul.
Blurt has no listings yet—
but it has its covenant:
Freedom is not a privilege for whales. It is the birthright of every voice.
So go.
Before the lights go out completely.
—
Bilpcoin: We don’t reward silence. We amplify truth.
peakd.com/hive-196233/@bpcvoter1/the-buildawhale-farm-scam-chapter-3 #hive vs #blurt #thedarksideofhive #buildawhalescam #itsjustmarky #acidyoscam #acidyofarm #hurtlockerscam #hurtlockerfarm @themarkymark/activities @themarkymark/wallet @buildawhale/wallet @buildawhale/activities @ipromote/activities @ipromote/wallet @usainvote/wallet @usainvote/activities
@hurtlocker/wallet
@hurtlocker/activities
@opinion-voter/wallet
@opinion-voter/activities
@ocdb/wallet
@ocdb/activities
@antiabuse18/activities
@antiabuse18/wallet
@test.ureka/the-untrending-report-hive-downvote-analysis-2025-06-27-20250627213824
@ureka.stats/the-untrending-report-hive-downvote-analysis-16-09-2025-20250916181314
https://www.publish0x.com/@bilpcoinbpc
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbH29p-63eW_PIi4l0KUNLMQ0ageCtkk5
https://www.youtube.com/@bilpcoinbpc
https://www.youtube.com/@bpcaimusic
https://blurt.blog/@bilpcoinbpc/posts
@bilpcoinbpc/bpc-ai-truth-hurts