I don't mean to single out valueplan, for sure. So maybe I left the wrong impression. But I did mean to focus the analysis on it since it has the biggest funding and the effect on price would be more easily seen there. Another approach would be to analyze all the proposals combined and probably that is a worthwhile one to do as well (although might be more complicated, and I think it's more useful if you take a very close look at the granular data and notice patterns that way). Another reason is that in the interest of sparking some change in stakeholder voting, the valueplan seemed like the one that will have the most effect and probably the easiest to make changes to (though still not easy). So I wanted to inform stakeholders about it.