Liquidity pools and token staking are two mechanisms used in the cryptocurrency industry to incentivize users to hold and trade specific tokens.
In this post, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both these mechanisms and compare them.
Liquidity pools are pools of tokens that are used to facilitate trading on decentralized exchanges. These pools are created and maintained by liquidity providers who deposit equal amounts of two different tokens. In this post we will go over SWAP.HIVE and SPS pair.
One of the biggest advantages of liquidity pools is that they provide liquidity to decentralized exchanges. Another advantage of liquidity pools is that they can be a source of passive income for liquidity providers. By depositing tokens into a liquidity pool, providers can earn a percentage of the trading fees generated by the exchange.
However, liquidity pools also have some disadvantages. One of the biggest disadvantages is the risk of impermanent loss. Impermanent loss occurs when the price of the two tokens in a liquidity pool changes relative to each other. This can happen when one token experiences a price increase or decrease relative to the other token. When this happens, liquidity providers can experience a loss when they withdraw their tokens from the pool. This risk can be mitigated by choosing pairs of tokens that are less volatile, but it is still a significant risk that liquidity providers should be aware of.
Staking, on the other hand, is a mechanism used to incentivize users to hold specific tokens. Staking involves locking up tokens in a smart contract for a specific period of time, during which the user earns a reward in the form of additional tokens. This reward is usually a percentage of the total amount of tokens staked by all users.
One of the biggest advantages of token staking is that it can be a source of passive income for users who hold specific tokens. By staking tokens, users can earn additional tokens without having to actively trade or participate in the ecosystem. This can be especially attractive for long-term holders who believe in the value and potential of a specific token.
Another advantage of staking is that it can help to stabilize the price of a token. When users stake tokens, they are effectively taking them out of circulation, which can reduce the supply of tokens on the market. This reduction in supply can help to increase the demand for the token, which can drive up the price.
While staking is usually the "safer bet" it's main "disadvantage" is lower yield compared to liquidity pool and no earning from trading fees (which can make significant portion of profits).
I have put 1280 SPS paired with 79 SWAP.HIVE into liquidity pool. Rewards for that pool pay 41.75% APR in liquid SPS (2.928 SPS per day). Plus I'm currently earning another ~4% per year from trading fees.
If we stake same dollar value of SPS (2560), we get 0.947 SPS + 1.268 GLX +
0.093 Voucher. Which converted to SPS adds up to 2.04889463 SPS per day.
Putting SPS into liquidity pool gives us 30% more SPS per day + earning from trading fees, which may vary depending on trading volume.
It should come as no surprise that higher risk equals higher rewards. Personally, I stake about half of my tokens and put the other half into liquidity pools.
