RE: RE: PCR is diagnostic, rapid is screening.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: PCR is diagnostic, rapid is screening.

Words
148
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
5y

I'm glad you're doing your research. Unfortunately, the research is polarizing on the vaccine. https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-harvard-researcher-finds-absolutely-no-correlation-between-vax-rates-and-covid-cases-globally is a Harvard study (not that it matters that it came from Harvard, but some people think that makes it legitimate) that has found that vaccine rates haven't proven to be as effective as the vaccine creators publish...

I didn't get the vaccine. I got the antibodies instead through natural infection. I don't mind if people get the vaccine as long as they're fully informed before getting it. Learn all you can, then make a wise decision with the info you have... that's what I say. For me, I couldn't trust studies on efficacy when the virus had only been out 12 months, supposedly... really? How can you tell me the long term benefits will be there when it's something never fully experienced before other than in less legal Corona versions...

Thanks for sharing!

@bobthebuilder2: I'm glad you're | Ecency