Hello friends of Liberty; paraphrasing Dalí, painting a poop with glitter is still one no matter how much it shines and what we have done in this society is to paint with glitter a system that is really more dictatorial than democratic because really the only thing we are doing with this glitter with which we have covered this society that we are suffering from is a partitocratic system where you limit yourself to choosing who is going to be the satrap who is going to boss around your life and put his hand in your briefcase.
We have seen many examples of how the political class lies, manipulates, breaks its promises, sells itself to the highest bidder, obeys the postulates of international elites, betrays the electorate or has privileges that it denies to others. We have seen how even false ideology reaches extremes in which declared feminists sit on the bench for harassing women, where leading feminists laugh at the physical appearance of other women or LGBT defenders cancel a trans person for not being of their political ideology.
And we also find that those of us who try to denounce inconsistencies are subjected to coercion and censorship, because by letting you talk about these puppets they do it to give you a false feeling of absence of censorship, "there is no censorship here", "you can criticize political parties", "here there is democracy you can vote for political parties", they are NOT political parties, they are representatives of power that alternate in said power and you can criticize the political class all you want, as long as you do not criticize the substance of what imposed by the political class.
You can mess with the figure of that politician, you can mess with any supporter of a political party, but if you mess with what those parties impose, then you do suffer censorship and that is the real problem, that they let me vent by messing with Sánchez or Fijó but the prosecutor's office can attack you for saying coherent things, it's censorship, it's that poop painted with glitter.
We have very serious problems, such as migration issues, but if you talk about migration you have to be very careful so that they no longer cancel you socially, call you a fascist xenophobe and many things, but on top of that they send you to the prosecutor's office when it is really a question of mathematics, in a state, in a country, in a government, in a territory, call it whatever you want, where there is a shortage of housing where the price of rents and apartments are through the roof, where there is no construction, that it be massively legalized Those who are arriving, those people join a country where those who are already there cannot access housing, where are we going to put those people.
Why has the best social security system in the world deteriorated, because the first one who arrives, the first one who appears out there has the right to a health card and logically if all the people who join this free health care do not in turn contribute with resources that they generate via taxes or via social security contributions, these social services cannot be expanded and logically they become saturated.
We are seeing a country or rather a government where Urbi Torre happily begins to give all kinds of social aid and boasts, in addition to having a record, “Oh, we have reached the record, 2 million earning the interprofessional minimum wage, how proud we are”, it is the first time that a government is proud to recognize that there are more and more people who need help from the State to live when those same people not so long ago lived from their own work.
And if you criticize social policies or policies in which men are discriminated against for being men or in which the emphasis is placed on saying we are prepared for people to continue coming when we cannot guarantee health care for those who are already there, when not, our citizens cannot access housing due to its scarcity, we continue bringing people and more people to access what housing or how, but if you say so they cancel you, they point at you, they use the qualifiers that we know, that kit of disqualifications lacking and absent of argumentation.
