I'd be curious to hear what your long term improvements are to the current economic model. If you can "layman" it.
The most fundamental change is probably not very controversial at this point of time since many here have lived through the "vote wars" of the past few years: move the primary rewards for content to the 2nd layer, allowing for competing opinions on the quality of a post to co-exist. We've almost finished up the first step required for this work now with implementation of the HAF framework. The next major step is to implement a smart contract system on top of HAF to enable support for community-based tokens.
In addition to the above work, my related area of interest is to research ways to improve our ability to get and assess information and to improve our decision making processes (both as individuals, and as people organized in groups on larger tasks). To me this is the most important and challenging problem facing humanity nowadays, and I believe flaws in our current processes (e.g. bad governance models) have lead to a lot of unnecessary conflict and wasted effort.
I've discussed some of my early ideas for this research in the post below in a form that I hope is mostly accessible to the layman reader: @blocktrades/a-peer-to-peer-network-for-sharing-and-rating-information
I also wrote another post that goes more into depth on some of the technical details (which you might want to skip), but there's also more down-to-earth question/answers in the comment section of the 2nd post that may clear up some things up about my ideas so far: @blocktrades/modeling-information-in-an-information-rating-system
RE: The Hive Of Polarity: Information Underload And Questioning The Emperor's Clothing