To be honest, when I first heard about the movement to pull down these statues a while ago, I disagreed with the idea, mainly because I did just view them as historical images rather than as actual endorsements of the confederacy or of slavery, racism , etc.

My disagreement wasn't particularly strong, but I just didn't see it as worth the effort to destroy them, given they were works of art, and their creation had already taken place.

But over time, it's become clear to me that a fair number of people do view them as symbols more than history or art (both positive and negative symbols, depending on which side is asked about them). And that has really changed my view on the issue.

So while I used to think they should be left alone, I think it is best if they were removed. I find it sad that it's come to this, but mostly that's just because I find it sad that racism of this sort still exists, and to the extent that people on both sides of the argument are viewing these statues as symbols of racism, then I feel there is no longer any question they should be removed.

You'll note I say both sides, implying that the people most vocal about not removing these statues also view them as symbols of racism. And that's despite the fact that they will generally object to that notion.

That's a judgement I've made from personal experience: like anyone else, I've occasionally observed that some people can't help but interject racist comments into their casual conversation. The only person I know personally who's currently objecting to the removal is someone I've always understood to be very racist (from his direct comments to me over time). A lot of that is the product of his upbringing (he's an old southern man), but I don't think your background excuses such talk completely.