blocktrades's comments - older posts | Ecency

blocktrades

@blocktrades

79

Exchange cryptocurrency fast and easy

Resource Credits

Available

Used

Website

https://blocktrades.us

Created

2016-03-30 00:04

RSS Feed

blocktrades

4M

!Downvoted by users, Reveal content

RE: I opened a protocol PR: scale DHF payouts when HBD printing is suppressed

Now I am sorry, but that sounds like a bad joke. People getting paid by the DHF are more affected than people paying the DHF? .. That is nonsense and borderline disrespectul to people buying right now!

$ 0.000

10

blocktrades

4M

RE: I opened a protocol PR: scale DHF payouts when HBD printing is suppressed

The author of this article has confused the entire purpose of the hbd_print_rate and essentially hijacked it, claiming it had a different purpose that somehow got missed for the DHF. If you're interested

$ 0.000

1

blocktrades

4M

!Downvoted by users, Reveal content

RE: I opened a protocol PR: scale DHF payouts when HBD printing is suppressed

So far, I think the dumbest thing I've done today is to try to talk rationally to someone who starts a discussion by randomly guessing at the truth without a shred of research. Still the cost is low, so

blocktrades

4M

RE: I opened a protocol PR: scale DHF payouts when HBD printing is suppressed

For the past few years, I've spent far more on Hive than I've made off Hive. It always pays to check your assumptions before you sound off on them.

blocktrades

4M

RE: I opened a protocol PR: scale DHF payouts when HBD printing is suppressed

Right, to be clear: it doesn't fit any definition of backdoor I've ever heard and its to me it was used as a misplaced pejorative. In your restatement, it sounds like you're saying that it is a special

blocktrades

4M

RE: I opened a protocol PR: scale DHF payouts when HBD printing is suppressed

Do I want to rephrase it? No. You claim something I didn't say at all, and somehow think I should therefore rephrase what I actually said. Its a pretty aggressive argumentation tactic which I frankly resent.

blocktrades

4M

!Downvoted by users, Reveal content

RE: I opened a protocol PR: scale DHF payouts when HBD printing is suppressed

I never cease to be amazed by the number of people that think protocols should be changed the moment they don't personally like the results. The existing stake-based voting system is the core design principle

blocktrades

5M

RE: Release of new HAF API stack 1.28.6 next week

The main ideas for Lite accounts are embedded at the beginning and end of this issue:

blocktrades

5M

RE: Release of new HAF API stack 1.28.6 next week

I only use the terminal Claude (i.e. Claude Code) nowadays. One of our guys was originally using Desktop Claude which wasn't bad (seemed better than Copilot at the time), but then I found Claude Code to

blocktrades

5M

RE: Release of new HAF API stack 1.28.6 next week

Next thing we're planning to release after main release is Lite Accounts feature. I think this will simplify onboarding issues without giving rise to the "trust" and "long-term portability"

blocktrades

5M

RE: Release of new HAF API stack 1.28.6 next week

I've haven't tried Dispatch or Obsidian yet. Will look into them when I get a chance.

blocktrades

6M

RE: Release of new HAF API stack 1.28.6 next week

So far, at my max efficiency, doing many things at once, I've only been able to use around 80% of my 20x max license in a week, and typically it's been closer to 70%. The amount of usage is pretty generous.

blocktrades

6M

RE: Release of new HAF API stack 1.28.6 next week

Yes, coming up with innovative ideas for design and verification are now the main challenges for devs. Its almost exhausting creating new ideas because they can be implemented so fast. It's a strange new

blocktrades

6M

RE: Release of new HAF API stack 1.28.6 next week

I have a different perspective: in my opinion, the main difference is "Claude Code", the harness, not Claude Opus itself. Earlier on I used the same Claude AI in both copilot and in Claude Code,

blocktrades

7M

RE: Hive Dev Fund Proposal - Pilot (P1)

Yes, it is entirely a function of the tooling that makes Claude Code awesome compared to vscode.

blocktrades

8M

RE: Hive Dev Fund Proposal - Pilot (P1)

To be honest, github copilot is utter crap compared to Claude Code (although copilot seems nice until you use something better). This is not speculation: I and many of my devs experimented with both. For

blocktrades

8M

RE: Hive Dev Fund Proposal - Pilot (P1)

Implicit in the proposal is funding useful software. But obviously there will be different opinions about what is useful. If "useful" was a universal category, everyone would use the same software.

blocktrades

8M

RE: Hive Dev Fund Proposal - Pilot (P1)

Claude Code completely destroys ChatGPT for programming. I had this same kind of discussion with a bunch of my programmers at the beginning. They were using all kinds of AI products (other than Claude

blocktrades

8M

RE: Hive Dev Fund Proposal - Pilot (P1)

Funding tools vs Funding results: This is a no-brainer. If the devs don't have the tools, then we'll have far less results and they will cost a lot more. Just do the math: the cheapest reasonable programmers

blocktrades

8M

RE: Hive Dev Fund Proposal - Pilot (P1)

I expect this is likely to be THE most impactful DHF proposal ever if we get a sufficient number of qualified applicants. If all the Hive programmers master using Claude Code, we should see a huge leap