Actually, one of our new devs who I asked to play with hive.blog's interface to learn about it just reported the same thing to me now. I guess it's some new bug, and I asked him to notify @quochuy who

You're quoting a theoretical amount based on the current value of Hive, but most of that is not spendable. There's about 10M HBD that is spendable now, and it's more limited than that, because only 1/100th

This says volumes! This is a free speech platform by design and a dissenting opinion is damaging? You characterize this post and his comments as just dissent opinions, but they and his previous post on

I can see a problem with this type of thing in that people with lots of money coming into Hive, or people who have lots of money currently, just upvoting it for easy APR. There isn't any check or balance

I think the biggest argument against downvotes of a proposal is that it gives more power to large stakeholders to downvote a proposal they don't like, without interfering with other proposals. Right now,

I don't have any projects funded by the DHF. At the beginning of Hive, I planned to eventually use proposals to fund the work my team did, but in the meantime I made so much money in crypto investments

How do I not suffer proportionately? I am the sole recipient of curation rewards on TSU, as it has been since James gave me the delegation and I stopped needing to ask for delegations in exchange for rewards.

No, you're just trying to act like I was being "sneaky" about something. No, I was simply providing enough info to the person I was responding to so that they would understand my point. Odds

It has no downvoting because it was modeled after similar code used in BitShares. Apparently the BitShares version did allow downvoting in some early form, from what I've heard, but apparently it was removed

No, I don't expect anyone to get you to self-censor yourself. Where did you get that idea? I just don't think it makes sense for him to be amplifying your ideas with his stake, when it appears that your

Your coder could have probably done the extra work in less than an hour. He still could. It's not the whole history of hive, it's just a matter of pulling the price of hive on that date for each reward

Now we have the DHF. If things need funded it should go through the DHF. That is just your opinion. There was never any claim when the DHF was created that posts could no longer be used to fund develop.

I run tribesteemup, everyone knows that. It has been 100% transparent literally the whole time that the account has existed. Nice try though. Are you silly enough to think that every random Hive user knows

The people voting for funds to the DHF would benefit the same for voting for anything else. The curation rewards are a non-issue. They are a non-issue. There was an accusation that I was somehow gaming

The operation of the the hdbstabilizer is completely transparent, because it only undertakes operations on the blockchain. So if the current, well trusted operator (@smooth) ever decided to misuse those

I don't really understand what you're trying to imply by your question. It should be obvious, that to the extent I'm voting for hbdfunder comments, I'm voting less for other authors. But a fair amount

No, if you read his post above (and other posts he has maid in his blog), you will see he is actually on the other side of the issue. His primary complaint has been he is opposed to downvoting as a way

True, and there is a DHF for that, as well as devs who post updates which can be up-voted, and donations and such. To me, the biggest problem here is the lack of transparency ($30M in rewards last year

One rule for you, one rule for their mates. Speaking of which, I just noticed this today: The interesting part is that @kennyskitchen, the great champion against downvoting, seems to be the one that downvoted

I've already emailed James tonight to see if he supports this. I had an earlier email from him that leads me to believe he doesn't, but I'll see what he says.