Congrats!

I already answered the question, except I have no idea about this: "and/or received money directly, or indirectly, from Bitshares at any time in their lives?". I have no clue about who that might

It's not a simple question, because I don't track every "BitShares employee". I'm not even sure exactly what definition you intend, but assuming you mean anyone who received a salary from Invictus

The Hive code base was developed from the BitShares code base. For example, they still share the same p2p code today (this was the part of the code that my team wrote for BitShares). So it's hardly surprising

I'm not sure where you got the idea that witnesses are supposed to work 100% of the time for Hive, but that's just not the case, and it never has been. Witnesses are voted on primarily to act as trusted

"help develop the ecosystem" != "easier and cheaper promotion of BitShares" Also, as a side note, Dan Larimer wasn't involved in development of the gateway software or BlockTrades (the

Very unlikely, given we can see corresponding long term traffic on hive.blog as a result. IMO, I think the "hiveblockchain" marketing theory was pretty flawed.

I don't have google analytics, but we do have some info from cloudflare. I took a look at it about a week or so for the first time in a long time (I usually don't bother to monitor such things), and the

I haven't looked at Solana, but I'll take a look in the next few days.

Any chain that's running under one second block times is probably doing something funny to get around global network latency. As an example, EOS did a sort of workaround by having a single node generate

As far as I know, he does handle his own witness. You're the only one to claim otherwise, and after some of your previous claims, you probably can understand why I'm doubtful as to their accuracy. But

ROFL, just saw this while replying to your other messages. You are really, really bad at this linkage stuff. You obviously have no idea how funny this sounds to anyone who's familiar with both smooth and

The effects were figured out to the best understanding of the coder doing the work. But he's working on code he didn't write, and the code is difficult to understand and has no comments. In such cases,

Since he was planning on wiping out all humans on earth, I think he just wasn't concerned about it. Mostly this show is just for fun, of course, but it does bring up interesting questions about what exactly

Wasn't sure what you meant with the italics, but I don think he "accidentally" killed the original doctor. Without rewatching the original first episode, I recall it as being intentional, although

I'm really looking forward to it! It's nice to be moving out of the cleanup and optimization phase ,and into the "new ideas" phase in a big way. I'm particularly eager to start work on the 2nd

By the way, a small nitpick, but I think a more accurate way to report the amount added by inflation would involve adding back the amounts paid out by proposals to your chart of amount added by inflation

Nice report. IIRC, I think we ultimately received about 50K HBD from the imagehoster proposal (it wasn't funded for the first 3 days of its active time). For the 820K, did that remove the airdrop proposal

Check the bottom of my post for full details (I added clarifications to correct some misunderstandings about how the weights function), but the new algorithm is much more beneficial for late voters than

The current reputation serves a similar function, but I like your idea based on spam level (although we'd have to work out useful metrics), as something like that could be a more objective indicator.