Isn't the reason for the seven day window also to prevent delegating one's HP to several different accounts to be able to self-upvote own posts several times? I don't think so, as the 7 day post reward

It's a bit more active than you suspect, since configuring and monitoring a bot isn't totally trivial. But what, you think it would be better if I woke up every day, found every post that Haejin upvoted,

The current changes only impact storage of non-active voting and payout info (old votes and payout information is no longer retained in hived after a post has paid out). The actual calculation of payouts

I have a bot setup that counters some of ranchorelaxo's randomized upvote, so that rewards are distributed more evenly among all posters. It's nothing personal about your post.

I have a voting bot setup that automatically reduces the strength of the random votes of the ranchorelaxo account.

Most of the current core blockchain devs don't post onchain, so I'm generally summarizing their work right now. It's also possible to follow their work on gitlab on any given day using this link: Unfortunately

Then looks are deceiving. I don't know personally know haejin or ranchorelaxo, and as far as I can remember, I've never had even an on-chain conversation with either one of them. He's not voting based

A 1 one hive cap wouldn't work, because someone could just create a bunch of 1 hive accounts and vote with them. This would actually allow smaller stakeholders to abuse the voting system, making easier

Unless you're an exceptionally good writer, I wouldn't expect to make a living by posting on Hive. Most Hivers are here for reasons other than just making money.

You can ask around for a full history of ranchorelaxo if you like, but I don't have the time to repeat it right now. I can assure you his votes are not based on content. Right now I think he's upvoting

Yes, I actually edited it already. I usually find that I post and then have to edit the post for 5-10 minutes afterwards.

I could downvote Bernie's comments all day (well, and I did at one point, when he was upvoting them to milk rewards), and he'd simply laugh about it. But there's no rewards on the current comments and

OK, I see, you're suggesting that curation rewards be independent of relative voting time, but still leave curation rewards linear. It's an interesting idea. It leaves an incentive to vote (to get curation

I think there'll definitely be some form of token creation capability. We'll analyze code for Hive Engine, SMTs, and other possible technologies for it. This is one of the next tasks that BlockTrades team

It's the little icon. I believe there's also a warning when making transfers to those accounts.

The issue here isn't really freedom. Many of the same people that are arguing they shouldn't be required to mask would also insist you not be allowed to drive a car without a license, drive while intoxicated,

I think EIP generally helped in improving curation results, but I agree it's still far from perfect. One thing that would help would probably be somehow making it clearer how the rules work now, but the

I think you've successfully identified at least one of the problems for the erosion of freedom here in the US: people are fine with freedom as long as it doesn't allow people to act in ways they don't

SMTs are one proposed solution. It's quite different from my own ideas, but that doesn't mean they might not also solve some problems here, and I know many people are interested in some solution of that

Yes, and I don't demand deep thinking when it comes to debating problems with the platform. If someone keeps the focus on what those problems actually are, and responds to my points in turn, it helps me