the politician said in a statement.
And all this is because the Australian government is part of a program aimed at ending the anti-vaccine movement, after different organizations around the world including the European Union - the promoter of pharmaceutical oligopolies - realized that the percentage of children under seven years old who are unvaccinated has risen from 0.23% in 1999 to 1.77% in 2014.
In addition, in the United States, the American Medical Association has repeatedly discredited parents who refuse to vaccinate their children for reasons other than medicine and, like other agencies such as the World Health Organization, emphasize their ability to eradicate, protect and prevent the youngest from diseases such as measles, chicken pox and mumps.
Now with all this one could say that parents are irresponsible for not wanting to vaccinate their children and prevent them from getting sick, but is this really the case? The anti-vaccine movements have been opposing Vaccines such as Smallpox and the anti-vaccination leagues in England for centuries and were the precursors of these movements that would drive many other movements throughout the 19th and 20th centuries with respect to vaccines. Today, concrete evidence has been found of how negative vaccines can be for young children, and this is precisely why there is opposition to these types of vaccines such as measles and influenza. Politicians and their media campaigns claim that three million children's lives are saved each year by vaccination, yet they do not claim that vaccines are not as effective in preventing disease and that two million children die of immune-preventable diseases, not to mention the negative effects they have, but what makes vaccines so harmful and dangerous?
Despite being considered internationally a potent neurotoxin and constant warnings about its dangers - hidden or disqualified by industry and health policymakers - mercury, through a substance known as thimerosal or thimerosal, continues to be present in many of the vaccines that young children receive from birth.
The most striking thing about this is that the national and international authorities are not speaking out, they simply ignore the fact that this is happening and therefore there are no studies carried out by health centers or organizations around the world that carry out studies on the direct impact of thimerosal on health, there are no established minimum doses of mercury in the bodies of children with autism and yet it continues to remain on the market. This is precisely why more and more people have emerged to join the anti-vaccine movements imposed by bureaucratic organizations, these groups claim that there is a direct link between mercury as a cause of various neurological diseases.
There are also reports that demonstrate the presence of squalene in two of the three influenza A vaccines approved in Spain and many Hispanic countries, Focetria and Pandemrix, a little-known substance associated with numerous autoimmune diseases under the pompous name of Gulf War Syndrome. However, squalene is not the only toxic and dangerous substance inexplicably contained in vaccines that they want to absurdly inject into many people. There is another, thimerosal - used as a bactericidal and antifungal agent - whose controversy, against all logic, has been dragging on for decades. Because each molecule of thimerosal contains 49.6% w/w of mercury and today in the world of overinformation most people are aware that mercury is a neurotoxin. In spite of this, it is being injected together with antigen and other chemical substances subcutaneously in various vaccines without knowing the limits of the organism to its exposure, since no one has observed them.
Michael Wagnitz, Director of Research, Department of Toxicology, University of Wisconsin, USA, has been very critical of influenza A vaccines and their thimerosal content
In short, thimerosal, which is administered subcutaneously with the vaccine, breaks down once in the body into two compounds - thiosalicylate and ethylmercury - of organic mercury. And over the last few decades, organomercurial compounds have been confirmed as known toxic agents, especially for the central nervous system. There is little doubt that these compounds are extremely toxic because numerous scientific studies in animals and humans support this.
Fortunately not all vaccines contain thimerosal but in different countries they can be found in commercial brands that offer vaccines prescribed for Diphtheria/Tetanus/Topherin (DTP), Hepatitis B, Tetanus, Tetanus/Diphtheria, Tetanus/Diphtheria/Topherin/Hemophilus B and Influenza. It is true that only those of DTP and hepatitis B are in the childhood vaccination schedule, but that implies 4 DTP vaccines at 2, 4, 6 and 18 months plus 3 vaccines for hepatitis B, the first one at 24 hours of life and the following ones at 2 and 4 months.
That is, a child can receive up to 7 thimerosal vaccines from birth to 18 months, which means that they can receive up to 4 to 16 times the limits set as safe by the FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration).
In addition, when approaching the consequences of problems caused by mercury poisoning, it should be borne in mind that its toxicity is cumulative. In other words, we would not only be talking about what is in vaccines but also about environmental mercury and the mercury that currently contaminates many foods. And in the case of babies, the one that the mother could have passed on to the fetus. That is why the only valid bet at present is to eliminate any product that may be toxic, something that is especially applicable to vaccines containing thimerosal because its administration is also done in children in full neural development.
The US federal agency, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATDSR), recently answered the question of how mercury can affect children:
Although fewer and fewer people are advocating the use of any type of organomercurial compound and a good example of mercury sequestration is the recent decision by the European Union to ban mercury exports by 2011, trying to avoid environmental and health impacts as far as possible. In 2008, a study by the Department of Developmental Services (DOS) of California (USA) concluded that there was no evidence of a recent decrease in autism in California despite the exclusion of most traces of thimerosal from almost all childhood vaccines.
However, on the other side of the trench, researchers like Dr. Mark Geier and his son David Geier claim otherwise and continue to provide new evidence or clues. For the past 5 years the Gelers have been conducting epidemiological and toxicological studies at the Institute of Chronic Diseases in Silver Springs (Maryland, USA) on the possible relationship between thimerosal ethylmercury in vaccines and the high incidence of neurological damage in vaccinated children. And its results only point in the same direction that they have been doing for years.
Already in 2007, In their work A case series of children with apparent mercury toxic encephalopathies manifesting with clinical symptoms of regressive autistic disorder the Geiers found a significant relationship between the severity of the autism spectrum disorders and the total amount of mercury the children received through vaccines containing thimerosal or Rho (D) immunoglobulin preparations "Based on the differential diagnoses -say in their work - eight of the nine patients examined were exposed to significant amounts of mercury from vaccines or biological preparations containing mercury during their periods of fetal or childhood development and later between 12 and 24 months of age and those children, that were developing normally, suffered from toxic mercury encephalopathies that manifested with clinical symptoms consistent with a regressive autism spectrum disorder. The evidence of mercury poisoning should be considered in the differential diagnosis that contributes to some regressive autism spectrum disorders'. And in their October 2008 study A comprehensive review of mercury provoked autism the authors reconfirm their findings
In 2009 they published A prospective study of prenatal mercury exposure from maternal dental amalgams and autism severity, which examined the exposure of 100 children diagnosed with autism to mercury from their mothers' dental amalgams during pregnancy and concluded that
Thimerosal was developed in 1920 by the pharmaceutical multinational Eli Lilly and the product safety tests were based on a 1930 study of 22 dying patients suffering from meningococcal meningitis in a hospital in Indiana (USA) who were injected with solutions containing it and who were followed until their death which occurred in a matter of days. And because the patients had died of meningitis with no other symptoms, it was declared that there had been no adverse reaction to thimerosal and the product was declared safe for use.
From that moment on it was in fact already introduced in vaccines and other remedies such as antibacterial. Subsequently, when the FDA was given the authority in 1938 to approve new drugs introduced into the interstate market thimerosal was not subjected to any additional safety testing because it was considered that its age and lack of obvious short-term effects guaranteed its safety. Of course, in the 1930s and only 8 years after its creation, no one thought of possible medium- and long-term neurotoxic effects from the accumulation of mercury from various sources in the body. So the 1930 study remains the only known study of its presumed safety made with the substance directly on humans after more than 79 years of use.
In 1982, the FDA failed to assess whether it was safe to use it topically and the conclusion was negative because this component damages cells when applied to injured skin and also causes allergic reactions. But instead of ordering that their effects on vaccines be studied then, he simply recommended that the incidence of neurological problems in unvaccinated populations such as the Amish be studied and then compared the results with the incidence of those problems in a vaccinated population.
As is obvious, the study is still pending, why is there no laboratory interested in doing it? Can you imagine why? despite the fact that in 1991 a Merck researcher, after adding the amount of mercury accumulated by a child who complied with the U.S. vaccination schedule, sounded the alarm when he considered that children received amounts well above those considered safe by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). And many parents began to suspect that their children's developmental disorders were related to vaccines.
The EPA limit is based on the intake of methylmercury through food by a healthy adult and cannot therefore be a valid reference since thimerosal is injected directly into the bloodstream, does not pass through the defence organs that act against toxins and is not introduced progressively. And there is yet another reason that makes the comparison inconsequential until 1999 was assumed that the toxicological profile of thimerosal was the same as that of methylmercury but today it is known that the differences in toxicity between these two mercury compounds are very different. Already in May 2004, the Macfarlane BurnetCenter for Medical Research for Medical Research and Public Health in Australia concluded that "the fetal brain is more sensitive to mercury when it comes to ethylmercury than when it is methylmercury".
Clearly there is a problem that goes beyond people's safety and health. There is a bureaucratic component and, as I said earlier, there is no investigation of the effects of mercury by global health organizations. It is recurrent to think that there is a bureaucratic and corrupt component behind thimerosal injections, and it is evidently supported by most of the world's governments - for what purpose? will it be birth control on a global scale? is it a way to obtain less skilled and therefore more manipulable inhabitants? Let's remember that diseases related to the nervous system have been on the rise, as well as the decline in the average IQ for 60 years.
