TEDx: PEDOPHILLIA

Don't you think it's incredible how much money is invested to bring a message that sells the unnatural, the sick and the decadent as normal and admirable? This is the world we live in today, where facts do NOT matter and only people's feelings do. Truth as a concept of virtue has no value.

The fight to have homosexual behavior accepted and considered natural takes years and we know that cinema and television have helped a great deal in this cause, which of course entails large investments of money, time and effort. Now whether it's natural or not, it's a subject for another article. Lately, the aim has been to impose the acceptance of transsexuality, the 31 New Yorkers and the 122 UN genres that nobody really remembers and that are nothing more than a long list of mental illnesses with new names and a romanticization of pathologies and psychiatric disorders accepted by organizations such as the WHO.

And now what was missing as the cherry on the cake is being sought as part of the same agenda of destabilization and crisis for the control of societies in the West is an attempt to move the boundaries between paedophilia and healthy sexual attraction with the same discourse that has been used to achieve acceptance of the gender ideology but with subtlety.

For years, pedophilia activists have advocated the acceptance of the romantic and sexual attraction of adults to children and promoted the use of euphemisms such as pedosexuals or boylovers. Euphemisms have always been powerful tools in the vocabulary of those who seek to impose their feelings over true and empirical facts. In this case, we have a TEDx talk in apology to pedophilia, if you have not seen it here you can see it. I must say that TED's talks are getting more and more aberrant with each passing day.

The intention of the talk that bears the name "At the service of the legitimation of paedophilia" is precisely what the term paedophilia and what it implies does not seem to us to be as repugnant as it has always seemed to us, but that we welcome it as something more common, good and normal, then we go into discussions on the subject and finally legal acceptance. This has been the case with abortion, homosexuality, transsexuality, home occupations and homo-parentality.

The same strategy always but this time the exponents in TEDx talks use a series of techniques in which they can include messages of domination and persecution. Let's take a look at some of his techniques below.

In the video at the service of the legitimation of pedophilia, the use of soft lighting and a very slow way of speaking is used, which may well cause sleepiness or make us not alert to what we hear and, of course, accept such concepts without any resistance. Old brain reprogramming techniques.

One of the arguments used by this speaker in favor of her speech is that there are many more pedophiles than we think and because there are many of them then it is normal another typical argumentative ad populum fallacy.

The second and very common thing in other causes such as homosexuality, gender ideology, and abortion is the victimization of the victimizer and I say, victimizer, because although he has not yet perpetrated any abuse or crime, there is a powerful possibility and the desire to do so in him and if his behavior or pathology is promoted as normal it will not be long before he perpetuates this action.

The victimization of the pedophile includes bringing the image of the poor boy who is excluded from society and who will be judged if he confesses to what is happening to him, which according to the speaker at TED is very tragic. Pity is one of the tools most used by these destabilizing movements and with armed phrases such as "nobody is guilty of their feelings" they try to convince us as if we were incapable of giving a critical reading to their speeches, well.... many do not do so and that is why we find individuals who, unlike the great promoters of these ideologies, do not earn a penny for it by defending with all their mighty sentimentalism what they are sold with all this absurdity. When they say that no one is guilty of their feelings, they take away all responsibility for the pedophile's actions as if he were a dog or a cat that does what they do, driven by their instincts, and now, without guilt or responsibility, and yet they learn the lessons of the pets.

They normalize paedophilia and then come up with supposed scientific studies by strange authorities and independent authors who say that children require sexual experiences with adults as part of their healthy growth or something like The Huffington Post or ShitGround with cheesy testimonies from parents who admit that their children have confessed to wanting to have sex with adults and that they as sympathetic parents pleased them by finding the closest paedophile to please their child and that all parents should follow suit.

The legalization of pedophilia was something that Jean Paul Sartre and his wife, the mother of the gender ideology and idol of Lisa Simpson, Simone de Beauvoir in 1977 after a group of men abused boys under the age of fifteen, touched on. In their manifesto, they defended the right of children to have sexual relations with people of their choice. Sartre and Beauvoir were a sick couple whose habit was that she, as a teacher in high school, should seduce the young girls and then pass them on to him.

All this is not new, they are just salvaging what the fathers of such ideologies started a few decades ago and changing the way they engage in these debates. That everyone chooses their sex, that sex is a construction of patriarchal, macho and capitalist society, that women are lesbian by nature, all that they shout today are nothing more than the retrograde delusions of the heroine of a cartoon and both Collective Garbage and FakeGround sell it as if it was the most innovative thing.