I don't like this proposal, I feel like it's very circular. We are burning cards and burning assets to give away a bunch of packs which will wind up just making a bunch more cards. It will also likely

It does more harm than good to remove the cards and NFTy arcade, if anything working with NFTy and whatever exposure gained by them helps. It's a third party service and it would be better for us if they

Why not consider a proposal that only adds new packs to modern, or something like an 80/20 split, since modern is supposed to be more human heavy and certainly a more likely league for a new player?

Overall it still has to calculate 50k pelacors vs 1 pelacor, and it's much healthier for the ecosystem if the CP calculates the highest bcx of a card once, rather than the player renting or buying 50,000

I think the biggest problem with CP is that it allows multiples to be counted, if the algorithm was designed to only count the highest version of the card BCX it would be more manageable to calculate and

I think packs in rewards chest are a great way for a new player to get some extra modern cards and a good reward experience. I don't think the player reaction of getting soulbound cards is nearly as exciting.

In regards to the Aly situation, I'm not claiming that everything that was said about him was said by you, or was said in hive. Much of it was said in mav chat and other discord channels, but it was spurred

You should feel guilty for what you said about Aly. You maligned him personally with misinformation, accusing him of malfeasance publicly. You accused him of being the boss of Aggy and Matt and several

more personal attacks on people

I have done it many times when league lapsing occurred, it's not as hard as people make it out to be. It's very simple, if you have a higher level deck you will blow through the bots in lower leagues.

I didn't mention who I was talking about on purpose, because it refers to many people who have been this way, I have no idea why you are attacking me personally, unless you feel guilty of this. Still,

or the fact that he had voted in many other proposals without a peep from the bots for me but not bots for thee crowd

Congratulations you were browbeaten by a bunch of hypocrites who bot into taking what was once a close vote for the community and putting your thumb on the scale, putting it out of reach for a decision

That has always been the plan all along, and this has specifically been brought up by Matt in the townhall that is specifically what he is here to build. There are many other centralized games on the market

This only works as long as you don't decentralize the game, as soon as you distribute the games state so others can maintain and run their own API, this won't work.

This proposal should fail, it's tantamount to "bots bad, I hate bots, make them stop" but provides no details in how that should be done. I think proposals should not be amorphous hand waving

Will the next beta phase also be gated, or will it be an open beta? If so, How many packs would need to be purchased to play?

Please consider changing the name, dec-b is not a good name and it will cause further confusion to new players when faced with all the tokens the system currently uses. It would be great to instead choose

No, you already came out with the whitepaper and you need to commit to the outline of that whitepaper, especially now that the packs are already out.

Some days your #1 with 12-2 in the tournament, the next day you are 1-1 in a best of three and get the lurker to knock you out the first round. Guess who's renting the lurker now....