Hi xuanphuc98, I'm not sure I understand the question; could you elaborate? :)

To be clear though, I don't think that people will only be willing to share if paid to do so. I think that they'd be more willing to share on a platform where they share in the revenue created by the platform.

Thanks for joining the discussion! Regarding your first point, do you mean something other than the upvote percentage, as that isn't clear on the amount of value you'll be tipping? Also, I'm personally

Thanks for the input! Steemit was bullish too though, keep in mind. Do you think HIVE has the brand value of Steemit? And do you think brand value matters? Also, does HIVE solve the problems of Steemit?

Yeah, could be. Is that what you think?

Thanks for the feedback!

Thanks for the input!

Thanks for sharing!

Thanks for joining the discussion! Any particular reason why you think that, or are you just hopeful at this point? :)

Hi MrMe1984, I'm playing it close to the Chest, but it will allow a new, more interactive interface for the Steem Blockchain/Steemit and a new way of thinking about voting and giving reward to someone

So has a hard release date been completely abandoned? I don't see anything here? I just want to ensure that there is a fairly solid roadmap plan, since the longer we wait, the more difficult mass adoption

Yeah, absolutely; it's worth more, in my opinion. :)

start 10000.0 STEEM

lol I know how it works. I'm saying my opinion is it shouldn't work that way, because opinion/interest is often divided among stakeholders, and a witness will have to vote one way or the other... so one

Imho, protocol changes shouldn't be decided just by witnesses. There aren't enough witnesses for that not to be a really flawed way of doing it. It makes sense for nodes to be the main voters in

That's a FACT and I'll be doing just that! :)

Amen to that!

AMEN TO THAT! I literally emailed them to make sure they checked for bot behavior and I was right! :)

Yeah, we have to catch up!

Sure thing, you're welcome!