Few days back, crypto market took at sudden dip and there was panic in the beginning. Many members at BDC have turned into traders over the last 6-8 months. Not just any traders, but opportunist traders. Any major dips in the markets were taken as a buying opportunity and many people did the right thing, and that is staying solvent and have cash on hand. One of the most difficult things every trader has to face is to deal with this:
âthe markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.â âĻ John Maynard Keynes
For those who do not know who Keynes is, probably heard about the term Keynesian economics, which is currently the doctrine most major central banks follows. It is a macroeconomic policy that has radically changed how governments reacts to any kind of economic crisis or recession. It is a departure from classical âfree marketâ thinking that, in short or medium term, a free market will automatically provide full employment. Now in modern times, we know that is not the case. So, the central banks must have a monetary policy to control both the bubble and the recession. They typically cut the money flow when they see a bubble and flood the market with free money (stimulus) when there is a recession or crisis. This is considered a safety mechanism.
This theory is not just written for/in books and no reason to think that this is no big and doesnât apply to personal finances, because right now on hive, I can show you that it does. Just like many other crypto, hive is volatile. Since we are here all the time and transactions are feeless, we always have a use for hive both inside and outside of the ecosystem. Typically, when prices rally, people tend to sell towards the high or at least into the rally. Also, they tend to buy then the prices are low. However, trouble is:
1. How low is low, and how high is high?
2. Also letâs assume that someone sold at the high, and now waiting with cash (stable coin) to buy at the low; when does the buy program starts?
3. If you buy all at once at any given price, the price can move below your buy price
4. If you buy in batches, price can go below your last batch of buy
So, there is the fact, you might think market is irrational and should bounce, but market doesnât listen to you and can continue to go down. So, Keynes was correct after all! Also, Keynesian economics can be application to our little personal finances.
Therefore, it is always recommended to keep some cash (stable coin) at hand. Never go completely out. It is not an easy thing to do in real life, but we should all try and practice it. If you struggle with it, you can set up a wallet that is not easy to open and keep it away from common use. You can do several layers of this and hopefully, you never have to go to the last layer.
Catching a falling knife means buying something as the price is dropping. If is usually not recommended, but people do it all the time. I personally do not have any problems with it. As long as you have lots of bandages available! đ
Art by @artistparthoroy
Editor
Throughout our life, we get reality checked by a number of events that in nature are out of our control. The ongoing pandemic and the causality of it is a testament to that statement. That is because we often take the peaceful conflict free lives of ours for granted. And so, often, or to be more accurate most of the time, we are completely underprepared for the mishaps that befall us. May that be a simple sickness or a life changing event. But a fascinating thing to consider is that most of us almost always think we are above and beyond such adversities.
At times we even fantasize about how if we were to get entangled in such events, we would do this, that and voila, we have solved the global food crisis and vice versa. For example, I am certain that most of us who have watched movies about zombie apocalypse or a dystopian future, have imagined ourselves in the shoes of the protagonist and imagined how we would have approached those situations and what we would have done differently. We find cheap grandeur in doing so. But, what we fail to see is that those characters, heroes and saviours are protected by plot armor. And so when troubles actually start hitting us, we are in complete awe!
For example, only a few weeks back, right before the lockdown I had a lengthy discussion with a local shop owner. He was saying that the imminent lockdown due to the second wave of covid is a sham and it's actually hurting small time, financially not that solvent business owners like him. In his opinion, it's better to keep the shops, malls and markets open. As it is the time of Ramadan and Eid, now is when they make most out of their businesses. Well, his logic is firm and solid. It's natural to fear hunger over a low probability of catching a highly contagious virus. But, what he failed to see is that even if he profited double what he usually makes, in a country like Bangladesh where public health services don't work , where one has to depend on very expensive private hospitals and clinics, if he gets infected, the opportunity cost would be too illogical and massively one sided. A few days ago he and his father tested positive for covid and the father as he is very old is having a tough time. Even though he was vaccinated, it failed to develop immunity against the newest triple mutated strain. Now, I am not someone who likes to see others in dismay and says âtold you soâ just to prove a point, but the point was proven nonetheless.
-Head Clerk
I usually don't write short reviews, because, for one, I like to talk, and, two, I feel like the audience is being cheated. But I will make an exception today, since the film I want to shed some light on, will only attract only a few.
The protagonist of this film is a film critic of the famous film magazine Cahiers Du Cinema. He's an eccentric fellow and everyday he sits with the children at the cinema theater so he can be at front, the best viewing experience in his notion. He sits there, brings up his notebook and writes down criticism while viewing the filmâin real time!
One day, he suspects that a woman is spying on him. A film critic who belongs to a rival film magazine, Positif. An unlikely love-hate relationship is about to be knocking on the door.
That's the story. The director of the film is one of the minors of French New Wave and some of the remarks from the film might sting even beyond their humor. You can't retaliate, also can't laught it off! For instance â one of them says, filmmaker antonioni stole everything from Cottafavi. What nonsense! Haha!
Even though this is a meta film, and essentially a bait for cinephiles, I think people from the mass might like it as well.
āĻāĻŽāĻŋ āϤāĻāύ āĻā§āĻŦāϞ āĻāϞā§āĻā§āϰ āĻāĻŖā§āĻĄāĻŋ āĻĒā§āϰāĻŋāϝāĻŧā§ āĻŦāĻŋāĻļā§āĻŦāĻŦāĻŋāĻĻā§āϝāĻžāϞāϝāĻŧā§āϰ āĻā§āĻāĻžāĻ ā§ āĻĒāĻž āϰā§āĻā§āĻāĻŋāĨ¤ āĻāĻāĻžāϧāĻžāϰ⧠āϏāĻŽā§āĻŽāĻžāύ āĻļā§āϰā§āĻŖā§āϰ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻĒāĻžāϰāĻŋāĻŦāĻžāϰāĻŋāĻ āϏāĻŽā§āĻŽāĻžāύ āϰāĻā§āώāĻžāϰā§āĻĨā§ āĻāĻŽāĻŋ āϤāĻāύ āύāĻŋāϰāϏ āϰāϏāĻžāϝāĻŧāύā§āϰ āϰāϏ āϏāĻāĻā§āϰāĻšā§ āĻŦā§āϝāϏā§āϤāĨ¤ āĻŦāϰāĻžāĻŦāϰāĻ āĻāĻŽāĻžāϰ āϏāĻžāĻšāĻŋāϤā§āϝā§āϰ āĻĻāĻŋāĻā§ āĻā§āĻāĻ āĻāĻŋāϞ āĻāĻŋāύā§āϤ⧠āĻŽāĻžāϧā§āϝāĻŽāĻŋāĻ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻāĻā§āĻ āĻŽāĻžāϧā§āϝāĻŽāĻŋāĻā§ āĻĒāĻĻāĻžāϰā§āĻĨ, āϰāϏāĻžāϝāĻŧāύ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻāĻā§āĻāϤāϰ āĻāĻŖāĻŋāϤ āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧā§āϝāĻŧāĻž āĻā§āϞ⧠āĻŦāĻžāĻāϞāĻž āĻŦāĻž āĻāĻāϰā§āĻā§ āϏāĻžāĻšāĻŋāϤā§āϝ⧠āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧā§ āĻŽāĻžāϏā§āĻāĻžāϰāĻŽāĻļāĻžāĻ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻŦāĻāĻļā§āϰ āĻā§āώā§āĻ ā§ āĻāĻĻā§āϧāĻžāϰ āĻāϰāĻŦā§ āϤāĻž āϤ⧠āĻāϰ āĻšāϤ⧠āĻĻā§āϝāĻŧāĻž āϝāĻžāϝāĻŧ āύāĻž; āϤāĻžāĻ āĻ
āĻāϤā§āϝāĻž āϰāϏāĻžāϝāĻŧāύā§āϰ āĻāĻžāĻĄāĻŧā§āĻ āĻā§āϤ āĻšāϝāĻŧā§ āĻā§āĻĒā§ āĻŦāϏāϞāĻžāĻŽāĨ¤
āĻāĻ āĻĒā§āϰāĻĨāĻŽ āĻŽāĻžāϝāĻŧā§āϰ āĻāĻāĻāϞ, āĻŦāύā§āϧā§āĻĻā§āϰ āĻŦā§āϤā§āϤ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻā§āϰāĻžāĻŽā§āϰ āĻŽāĻžāϝāĻŧāĻž āĻā§āĻĄāĻŧā§ āĻŦā§āϰ āĻšāϤ⧠āĻŦā§āĻļ āĻāώā§āĻ āĻšāĻā§āĻāĻŋāϞāĨ¤ āϤāĻŦā§ āĻļāĻšāϰā§āϰ āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧāύ āĻāϞā§, āĻā§āϞā§āĻĄāϞāĻŋāĻĢā§āϰ āύā§āĻļāĻž āĻāĻŦāĻ āϰāĻŦāĻŋ āĻ āĻžāĻā§āϰā§āϰ āϞāĻžāĻŦāĻŖā§āϝ āĻ āĻā§āϤāĻā§ āĻĻā§āϰ āĻāĻŋāĻĄāĻŧā§ āϏā§āĻ āĻāώā§āĻ āĻā§āϞāϤ⧠āĻā§āĻŦ āĻŦā§āĻļāĻŋ āϏāĻŽāϝāĻŧ āϞāĻžāĻā§āύāĻŋāĨ¤ āύāĻžāĻāϰāĻŋāĻ āĻā§āϤā§āϰāĻŋāĻŽ āĻāĻžāĻāĻāĻŋāĻā§āϝ, āĻāĻžāϰā§āĻŦāύ āĻŽāύ⧠āĻ
āĻā§āϏāĻžāĻāĻĄ āĻŽāĻŋāĻļā§āϰāĻŋāϤ āĻĻā§āώāĻŋāϤ āĻŦāĻžāϤāĻžāϏ, āĻšāĻ āĻžā§ āĻāϰ⧠āĻĒāĻžāĻāϝāĻŧāĻž āĻ
āĻŦāĻžāϧ āϏā§āĻŦāĻžāϧā§āύāϤāĻž āĻā§āϰāĻŽā§āĻ āĻĢā§āϞ⧠āĻāϏāĻž āϏā§āĻŽā§āϤāĻŋāĻā§ āĻāĻžāĻĒāĻŋāϝāĻŧā§ āĻāĻ āϤ⧠āϏāĻŽāϰā§āĻĨ āĻšāϝāĻŧā§āĻāĻŋāϞāĨ¤
āĻ
āĻŦāĻžāϧ āϏā§āĻŦāĻžāϧā§āύāϤāĻž āϝ⧠āĻŽāĻžāĻā§ āĻŽāĻžāĻā§ āĻĒāϰāĻžāϧā§āύāϤāĻžāϰ āĻāĻžāϰāĻŖ āĻšāϤ⧠āĻĒāĻžāϰ⧠āϤāĻž āĻāĻŽāĻŋ āĻŦā§āĻļ āĻŦā§āĻāϤ⧠āĻĒāĻžāϰāϞāĻžāĻŽ āϝāĻāύ āĻāĻ āĻāϤāĻŋāĻļā§āϞ āύāĻžāĻāϰāĻŋāĻ āϏāĻā§āϝāϤāĻžāϰ āϏāĻžāĻĨā§ āϤāĻžāϞ āĻŽāĻŋāϞāĻžāϤ⧠āĻāĻŋāϝāĻŧā§ āĻĻā§āĻāϞāĻžāĻŽ āĻĒāĻā§āĻāĻāĻž āĻŦā§āĻļ āĻĢāĻžāĻāĻāĻžāĨ¤ āĻ
āĻāϤā§āϝāĻž āĻāĻžāϤā§āϰāĻĻā§āϰ āĻā§āώā§āϤā§āϰ⧠āĻāĻžāĻāĻžāϰ āϝā§āĻāĻžāύ āĻĒāĻžāĻāϝāĻŧāĻžāϰ āϝā§āĻāĻŋ āϏāĻšāĻ āĻĒāύā§āĻĨāĻž āϏā§āĻāĻž āĻāϰāϤ⧠āĻāĻĻā§āϝāϤ āĻšāϞāĻžāĻŽ āĻ
āϰā§āĻĨāĻžā§ āĻāĻāĻāĻž āĻāĻŋāĻāĻļāύāĻŋ āĻā§āĻāĻā§ āĻŦā§āϰ āĻāϰāϞāĻžāĻŽāĨ¤
āĻāĻŽāĻŋ āĻā§āϞāĻžāϏ āϏā§āĻā§āύā§āϰ āϝ⧠āĻā§āϞā§āĻāĻŋāĻā§ āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧāĻžāϤāĻžāĻŽ āϤāĻžāĻĻā§āϰ āĻŦāĻžāĻĄāĻŧāĻŋ āϧāĻžāύāĻŽāύā§āĻĄāĻŋāϰ āĻļāĻāĻāϰ āĻāϞāĻžāĻāĻžāϝāĻŧāĨ¤ āĻŦāĻŋāĻļāĻžāϞ āĻāĻžāϝāĻŧāĻāĻž āĻā§āĻĄāĻŧā§ āĻāĻāĻāĻŋ āĻĻā§āĻŦāĻŋāϤāϞ āĻāĻŦāύ āϝāĻžāϤ⧠āĻāĻŋāύāĻž āĻāĻŽ āĻāϰ⧠āĻšāϞā§āĻ ā§§ā§Ļ āĻāĻŋ āĻāĻā§āώ āϰāϝāĻŧā§āĻā§āĨ¤ āĻŦāĻžāĻĄāĻŧāĻŋāϤ⧠āĻāĻŽāĻžāϰ āĻāĻžāϤā§āϰ, āϤāĻžāϰ āĻŦāĻžāĻŦāĻž, āĻŽāĻž, āĻĻāĻžāĻĻāĻŋ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻā§āϝāĻŧāĻžāϰāĻā§āĻāĻžāϰāϏāĻš āĻŽā§āĻ ā§Ŧ āĻāύā§āϰ āĻŦāϏāĻŦāĻžāϏāĨ¤ āĻāĻŽāĻŋ āϝāĻāύ āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧāĻžāϤ⧠āϝā§āϤāĻžāĻŽ āϤāĻāύ āĻĒā§āϰāĻžāϝāĻŧ āĻĒā§āϰāϤāĻŋāĻĻāĻŋāύāĻ āĻĻā§āĻāϤāĻžāĻŽ āĻā§āϞā§āĻāĻŋāϰ āĻŦāĻžāĻŦāĻž āĻĄā§āϰāĻāĻāϰā§āĻŽā§ āĻŦāϏ⧠āĻŦāĻŋāĻļāĻžāϞ āĻāĻŋāĻāĻŋ āϏā§āĻā§āϰāĻŋāύ⧠āĻšāϝāĻŧ āĻā§āϰāĻŋāĻā§āĻ āĻā§āϞāĻž āĻ
āĻĨāĻŦāĻž āϏāĻŋāĻāύāĻāύā§āϰ āύāĻŋāĻāĻ āĻĻā§āĻāĻā§āĨ¤
āĻĒāĻžāĻļā§āϰ āĻāϰ⧠āĻāϰ āĻŽāĻž āĻšāĻŋāύā§āĻĻāĻŋ āϏāĻŋāϰāĻŋāϝāĻŧāĻžāϞ āĻĻā§āĻāϤ⧠āĻŦā§āϝāϏā§āϤ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻāϰ āĻĻāĻžāĻĻā§ āĻŦāĻžāϰāĻžāύā§āĻĻāĻžāϝāĻŧ āĻŦāϏ⧠āĻāĻāĻžāϧāĻŋāĻāĻŦāĻžāϰ āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧāĻž āĻšāϝāĻŧā§ āϝāĻžāĻāϝāĻŧāĻž āĻāĻŦāϰā§āϰ āĻāĻžāĻāĻāĻāĻŋ āĻāĻŦāĻžāϰ āύāϤā§āύ āĻāϰ⧠āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧāĻā§āĨ¤ āϏāĻĻā§āϝ āĻĒā§āϰāϝāĻŧāĻžāϤ āĻāĻŦāĻŋ āĻļāĻā§āĻ āĻā§āώ āĻāϰ āύāĻŋāĻā§āϰ āϞāĻžāĻāύāĻā§āϞā§āĻ āĻāĻŽāĻžāĻā§ āĻŦāĻšā§āĻĻāĻŋāύā§āϰ āĻĒā§āϰāύ⧠āĻāĻ āĻāĻāύāĻžāĻāĻŋ āĻāĻŦāĻžāϰ āϏā§āĻŽāϰāĻŖ āĻāϰāĻŋāϝāĻŧā§ āĻĻāĻŋāϞāĨ¤
āϤāĻžāĻāĻžāĻ āύāĻž āĻāϰ āĻā§āĻā§āϰ āĻĻāĻŋāĻā§, āĻāĻŽāĻŋāĻ āĻāĻžāĻ āύāĻž āĨ¤
āύāĻž-āϤāĻžāĻāĻžāĻŦāĻžāϰ āĻ āĻā§āĻšāĻžāϤ āϤ⧠āĻāĻā§āĻ āĻšāĻžāĻāĻžāϰ āĻšāĻžāĻāĻžāϰ āĨ¤
āĻāĻāĻāĻž āĻāĻĨāĻžāĻ āĻā§āϰāϤ⧠āĻĨāĻžāĻā§ āĻ āύā§āĻĻāϰā§-āĻāύā§āĻĻāϰā§
āϤā§āĻŽāĻžāϰ āĻāĻŽāĻžāϰ āĻŽāϧā§āϝ⧠āĻāĻāύ āϏā§āϤ⧠āĻā§āĻŦāϞ āĻŦāĻžāĻāĻžāϰ āĨ¤
āĻāĻ āĻāĻĻā§āϰ āĻāĻžāϰāĻŋāĻĻāĻŋāĻā§ āĻ
āĻŦāĻžāϧ āϏā§āĻŦāĻžāϧā§āύāϤāĻž, āϤāĻžāϰ āĻĒāϰā§āĻ āĻā§āĻĨāĻžāϝāĻŧ āϝā§āύ āĻāϰāĻž āĻĒāϰāĻžāϧā§āύāĨ¤ āύāĻŋāĻā§āĻā§ āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧā§ āϏāĻŦāĻžāĻ āĻāϤāĻāĻžāĻ āĻŦā§āϝāϏā§āϤ āϝ⧠āĻāĻā§ āĻ
āĻĒāϰāĻā§ āϏāĻŽāϝāĻŧ āĻĻā§āĻāϝāĻŧāĻžāϰ āĻāĻŋāĻāĻŦāĻž āĻā§āĻā§ āĻā§āĻ āϰāĻžāĻāĻŦāĻžāϰ āĻŽāϤ⧠āϏāĻŽāϝāĻŧāĻā§āĻā§ āĻĒāϰā§āϝāύā§āϤ āĻāĻžāϰāĻ āύā§āĻāĨ¤ āĻšāϝāĻŧāϤ⧠āϰāĻžāϤā§āϰ āĻāĻāĻāĻŋ āύāĻŋāϰā§āĻĻāĻŋāώā§āĻ āĻĒā§āϰāĻšāϰ⧠āĻĒā§āϰāĻžāĻā§āϤāĻŋāĻ āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧāĻŽā§ āĻāĻŋāĻāĻŦāĻž āĻļāĻžāϰā§āϰāĻŋāĻ āĻāĻžāĻšāĻŋāĻĻāĻžāϰ āĻāĻžāϰāĻŖā§ āĻā§āϰā§āĻŽā§āĻā§āĻŽā§āϰ āĻāĻĻāĻžāύ-āĻĒā§āϰāĻĻāĻžāύ āĻšāĻā§āĻā§ āĻ āĻŋāĻāĻ āĻāĻŋāύā§āϤ⧠āĻŽāύā§āϰ āĻĻā§āϰāϤā§āĻŦ āĻŦāĻžāĻĄāĻŧāĻā§ āϝā§āĻāύ āϝā§āĻāύāĨ¤
āϤāĻžāĻ āĻāĻ āĻāĻ āĻĒāϰāϏā§āĻĒāϰā§āϰ āĻŽāϧā§āϝāĻāĻžāϰ āĻā§āϰāĻŽāĻžāĻāϤ āĻā§āώāϝāĻŧ āĻšāϝāĻŧā§ āϝāĻžāĻāϝāĻŧāĻž āϏā§āϤā§āϰ āĻŽā§āϰāĻžāĻŽāϤ āĻāϰāĻž āĻā§āĻŦ āĻāϰā§āϰāĻŋ āĻšāϝāĻŧā§ āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧā§āĻā§āĨ¤ āĻāĻŋāύā§āϤ⧠āĻĻā§āĻāĻā§āϰ āĻŦā§āϝāĻžāĻĒāĻžāϰ āĻšāϞ⧠āĻāĻ āϏā§āϤ⧠āϤā§āϰāĻŋāϰ āĻāĻžāϰāĻŋāĻāϰ āĻā§āϞāĻŋ āĻā§āϰāĻŽāĻļāĻ āĻāĻŽāĻžāĻĻā§āϰ āĻā§āĻĄāĻŧā§ āĻāϞ⧠āϝāĻžāĻā§āĻā§ āĻ
āĻāĻžāύāĻžāϰ āĻĻā§āĻļā§, āϝā§āĻŽāύāĻāĻŋ āĻāϞ⧠āĻā§āϞā§āύ āĻļāĻā§āĻ āĻā§āώāĨ¤ āĻāĻŋāύā§āϤ⧠āϤāĻžāϰāĻž āĻāϞ⧠āĻā§āϞā§āĻ āϤāĻžāĻĻā§āϰ āϞā§āĻāĻž āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻāĻļāĻžāϰ āĻŦāĻžāĻŖā§ āĻā§āϞ⧠āĻŦā§āĻāĻā§ āĻĨāĻžāĻāĻŦā§ āĻāĻā§āĻŦāύ; āϝā§āĻā§āϞ⧠āĻĒāĻĄāĻŧā§ āĻŽāĻžāύā§āώ āĻāĻā§ āĻ
āĻĒāϰāĻā§ āĻāĻžāĻā§ āĻāĻžāύāĻŦā§ āĻāĻŦāĻ āĻā§āĻāĻžāĻŦā§ āĻŽāύā§āϰ āĻĻā§āϰāϤā§āĻŦāĨ¤
āĻāĻāĻāύā§āϝā§āĻ āĻāĻŽāϰāĻž āĻŦāϞāĻŋ āϝ⧠āĻā§āϰā§āϤāĻŋāĻŽāĻžāύā§āϰ āĻŽā§āϤā§āϝ⧠āύāĻžāĻ, āϤāĻžāϰāĻž āĻāĻāύā§āĻ āĻŽāϰāϤ⧠āĻĒāĻžāϰ⧠āύāĻž, āϝā§āĻŽāύāĻāĻŋ āĻļāĻā§āĻ āĻā§āώ āĻŦā§āĻāĻā§ āĻĨāĻžāĻāĻŦā§āύ āĻĒā§āϰāĻāύā§āĻŽ āĻĨā§āĻā§ āĻĒā§āϰāĻāύā§āĻŽ āĻāϰ āĻŽāϧā§āϝ⧠āϏā§āϤā§āĻŦāύā§āϧāύ āĻšāϝāĻŧā§āĨ¤
Flawless - thereâs a reason why this word exists. Although now a lot of debate circles around the meaning and subtext within it, and some might even go to the extent of changing the very definition of it. The perfection, the flawlessness seems somewhat soulless; I wonder if thatâs the reason people feel so different about it. Some hail it and some disregard it, but the word still endures all that paradox. As if flawless, being flawed, or however mean, will always survive. It can get muddied by conjectures, but it will sustain.
Worry was setting in on her. She was twisting her fingers, trying to distract herself from what was about to happen. Her heart beating like a drum so loud that she can hear it. She was thinking of something else; anything else, the dinner with her friends the next day, the dress she will pick, the accessories. It was futile; trail of thoughts went back to the competition. Discontent with her preparation, she felt frustrated, even though she practiced day and night. She doesnât believe she gave it her best effort. Kept mumbling the song she was about to sing in presence of the audience. This is the first time sheâll be appearing on stage. The stage has been a lifelong dream and a nightmare, mostly because she perceive herself as an average. An average is flawed and imperfect; she longed to be impeccable like her idol. What if she forgets the lyrics? Fear of losing was becoming monumental, sheâll be a laughingstock if she made a mistake. All her thoughts came back to what she was facing at the time. She knows her competition, and that only caused her to be more nervous and couldnât sit down anymore; she started walking. Standing in front of the mirror, the questions echoed in her mind. Tugging her hair behind her ears, she took a deep breath, and then another. Itâs too late to back out at the moment. âWhy am I not perfect?â She thought. She forgot to question what is perfect.
Flawless isnât achievable, itâs impossible; but that is half the truth. We have our own set of notions about transcendence and imperfection. A garden full of beautiful flowers and trees at its pristine condition may appear as divine to some and hollow to others. As humans, we are adapted to having assumptions; we accept some opinions that are suitable to our liking and we detect loopholes in others. Perfection is impractical because we ourselves are complex beings will consistently find a flaw even in the most proper of settings. We made it unachievable, and flawless became a random word in the dictionary, repeatedly used but seldom understood. Even the most immaculate structures may be perceived as hollow, and a broken down palazzo may look majestic with debris falling off of them.
Whatâs attainable is excellence, and it often requires millions of mistakes to reach that highest peak; we often call it perfection, but excellence or greatness is not even anywhere close to becoming perfect. The pursuit of perfection is a lost cause, and people often lose their individuality while chasing a myth. We ourselves are flawed beings and our flaws make us unique; our flawed nature will only appear flawless through our own acceptance and care. She doesnât have the same voice, no oneâs voice is similar. Expecting to sound like the original singer is unrealistic; sheâll lose her uniqueness in the process. All she can do is sing her heart out, give it her own flare and own the stage like this is where she belongs. So, even though she will not sound exactly how the song was supposed to, it will be her own way of singing and that will be her impeccable performance. Her originality will make her memorable. If we all were perfect, then all our beliefs will be the same, there wonât be room for contradictions or conflicts. Isnât that unnatural?
Misunderstanding! One of the most deadly things which cause us huge damages. A few months ago I shared an experience of an organization that works with books in our city. The founder of the organization stays abroad and he has some volunteers who manage everything. I was one of those volunteers but I couldnât give proper time but I am always connected with them. It is a nice platform that lends books for free for reading to book lovers. So this is a great place for the students who can't afford to buy huge numbers of books.
Managing this kind of organization is pretty hard. Sometimes there needs to be some strict rules and regulations to maintain everything properly. Recently a dispute came among the core team over a tiny issue that became public. People are very hard to digest insults or punishments publicly which created mass chaos in the core team and the team is being divided and leaving the organization. There was a member who had taken 30 books and kept them for more than 90 days without proper explanation and that's against the rules. So it was declared by the founder that the membership of that person will be canceled and instructed not to receive those books from that member in the future. One of the volunteers received the books avoiding the instruction of the founder which started the dispute and it ended up in the fall of the organization. He was melted by the requests of that member and avoided that instruction. Actually, he didn't expect that the situation would worsen. Nobody knows the future of the organization currently.
Some things could be sorted out if discussed with patience. When one side is heated up then the other side should cool down and handle the situation, find out the problem, and solve it calmly. These kinda things we do face in our personal life too. We all encounter this thing "misunderstanding" many times and make things worse.
Do not forget to join our next weekly hangout on at Friday 10 pm GMT +6