Thankyou steev! I always appreciate your input. Please do have a think about it and get back to me if you have any awesome ideas,or if you meet anyone who you think would like to check it out. In terms of 'verifying the charities' I addressed it a bit in my reply to @grampo below, but essentially I feel that official lines of verification and certification have almost always been proven to be hackable. I have proposed 'proven earnest endeavour' which seeks to be a more intuitive human approach that is transparent to the public and allows for their input. Essentially we already have this sort of system on HIVE. Anyone can check the wallet transactions of the team who is performing the curation. Anyone can begin a public discussion with the team if they have concerns over a certain project or individuals involved, and progress can be made intuitively (not always comfortably) by the HIVE mind. I cant imagine a better long term, sustainable, trustworthy verification device than the public eye! In fact I think theres some kind of data about the incredible power of hivemind decision making to outcompete individuals with high IQ when it comes to decision making. Are we ready to trust the HIVEmind?