I wonder how many of the proponents for the 200% vote have thought of the effect that would have on down vote efforts to prevent abuse such as haejin an rancho are perceived to be doing. It takes a lot of effort to cancel out or remove their vote. What effect would two free 200% down votes do? Would the larger orcas look more closely at malicious down voting of content because the the down voter disagreed with the content not the rewards, or malicious down voting because of country or race or politics. Right now when the largest accounts down vote content there is not much people, even other large orcas can do about it.

There is a lot that can be done on the up and down voting front, I hope for HF 26 some of the vote issues can be resolved.