I was not suggesting that Steemit was for Children...only that there are no real safeguards in place to prevent children from accessing the material on it.
And there cannot be. This js exactly why you're a fucktarded twat. You expect that there exists a viable way to prevent children from accessing one of the most public places in the world: Steem.
And how exactly would you propose to supervise children so that they cannot access such material, when virtually any tablet or phone can access the material nearly as well as with a computer?
Easy. You block Steem. Or the internet. Or you get a Choice Parental Control Suite and learn how to fucking parent you twat.
Clearly you do not have any kids, or you would not ask such a question, because you would already know that such supervision on all the different devices available to kids today is next to impossible.
Clearly either you don't know jack shit about parenting children and the internet because almost any kid ought to tell you exactly what I said about Parental Controls. Also, you probably think Supervision means something other than being present and Supervising. Twat.
It is no longer acceptable to allow sites to post as they will, forcing the onus on parents to protect their kids, any more so than it would be acceptable to sell a gun to a person with known mental problems, forcing parents to protect their kids and other loved ones from such people.
This is why you're a twat, reason 53. You think that everything should cater to children and that parenting is simply Having Kids. No you twat. You are responsible for your kids, not the internet.
RE: LOW-LIFE DOWNVOTING MEMBERS