Actually, I'd bet money that this propaganda machine is at least in part behind Daily Mail stories like this one and this one. Watching rehashed Russian propaganda seep into my social media feeds feels surreal. But I digress.

What makes it Russian Propaganda? The first one, is Russian Propaganda? And the second one, allegedly entirely from Ukraine Officials, is Russian Propaganda? If you're going to provide examples, please make them make sense, ESPECIALLY when the first source of your first article regarding Propaganda a la Rusky, is a god damn NON source of ANY such propaganda and instead is crazy-still-suggesting that Rusky helped Trump win. Make it make sense, even more so, befuddled as everyone is since the WEF youtubed their you'll own nothing and be happy, please make it make sense! The so called Propaganda, in your first article, is for an Article from Sputnik, where they remark that:

At the same time, the author concludes that “to create a dystopian world like the one embodied in the Great Reset Conspiracy Theory, no conspiracy is needed” because the erosion of freedom in the West has already started.

Thats the Propaganda, an authors opinion, blatantly so, entirely one individual, and his thought on the situation, following the article with

The headline of a Sputnik article from January thus reads “Fact or Fiction: The Great Reset Conspiracy” and the author pretends to weigh the arguments for and against the conspiracy theory in a nuanced way and even acknowledges that nothing that substantiates the conspiracy theory could be found in the book of the same name.

Next:

Another Sputnik article from November titled “Netizens Delve Into ‘The Great Reset’ Conspiracy Theories After Unearthing Trudeau’s Old Video” highlighted tweets from several fringe Twitter accounts spreading the Great Reset conspiracy theory, without presenting any additional comments or context and thus amplifying the conspiracy theory without directly supporting it.

Such as? Its very convenient to allege that context was removed or context was necessary, without providing any context, sin any indicai of wtf is missing or misleading.

On RT (formerly Russia Today), articles about the Great Reset are more opinionated: “Humans of the GREAT RESET: What the future MIGHT look like in 2021 – if the controlling elites have their way” features pictures of Bill Gates, Prince Charles, and WEF founder Klaus Schwab and suggests the architects of the Great Reset plan to get access to your vaccination record and your personal ID and want to make the average person “own nothing”. The article also claims the global climate protests are basically the WEF’s “own activist movement” funded by the WEF and that “it’s easy to imagine world leaders and corporations taking advantage of the chaos to impose more controls over the populace”, concluding that if you discuss any of this you’re wrongly labeled a conspiracy theorist. Another RT article is even more blatant, claiming “the Great Reset is not a conspiracy theory; it’s a conspiracy fact” and blaming it for “woke madness, cancel culture, Covid lockdowns, Antifa/BLM riots, Big Tech censorship, and the endless propaganda coming out of mainstream media.” The article concludes that the Great Reset is “the source of all your suffering.”

Yup, Russian Propaganda, not a documentary of Facts followed by the forlorn conclusion based a pattern of behavior which indicates resoundingly clearly what the Government and WEF promotes and prefers and support, and what, and especially, who, they don't. Nope, all that, is a lie, exaggeration, missing context or vaguely discredited as misinformation, and everyone knows the finances of the institution, journalists and simply nationality, is the only significant and determining factor for if something is propaganda or not, don't mind what makes it misinformation, don't mind that you sir, now are promoting propaganda, least a glimpse of self reflection dawns, just promote, blatant nonsense, blatant propaganda, about Alleged Russian Propaganda.

Alas..

Over the years, Dolan has consistently done excellent work on UFO disclosure. This latest video left me feeling like he's become afraid of technological advancement, which was surprising. His apparent belief in a Star Trek universe, filled with benevolent interacting ETs, implies a universe with a technological basis far more advanced than humanity's. Wouldn't it maybe behoove us, then, to chart a course from here to there?

All is consciousness. What are your thoughts on that? Or Dr. Steven Greer?