Absolutely. I know all about @bronko's other proposal. It's, as you say, basically the same; there's just a change to one word in his statement:
"accounts with a completely normal deck and no harmful behavior will have to rent own CP unnecessarily. This doesn’t make sense"
Everything I said applies, just as much, to the original proposal as it does to this one- restrictions in a format called "Wild", don't make sense.
OTOH: any pro-bot/anti-player proposals, such as these, will always receive my hearty approval and endorsement.
RE: SPS Governance Proposal - Alternative to Solution to Minimize Bot Farms