Not to pile on, concerning the many, glaring errors in your proposal, logic, and reasoning but... What you are proposing and stock buybacks are in no way related. Corporate stock buybacks are not "burn

Yaaaas SPL needs the flywheel- it's the only way to contain token inflation. Right now, the wheel is broken and IMHO- Vouchers have broken the wheel. Vouchers are getting burned in lieu of DEC, because

YAS! Stop paying license holders- just pay people who run nodes, based on the amount of traffic their node gets. This would prepare license holders to begin securing the decentralized future of the game.

YAS! So many better ways to approach this issue. So many, many simpler solutions to this problem. For one, maybe not "getting rid" of Vouchers- maybe just stop printing them? The ones in circulation

Ahhh, Dave. So simple, so naive. While the other proposal (put bots back in Modern) does exist and while it may mitigate some of the nightmarishness of that format- it has it's own issues, so let's not

I just wanted to let you know- you're not the only one who "realizes that the baseline argument here is just not true" The economics in the game are not working properly- because the incentives

The first part of this proposal (halving the SPS multiplier) would, by itself, crush SPS value and increase the % of rewards given to bots in Wild. The second part of the proposal (blocking out new/casual

Don't forget the affect the first part of the proposal will have on SPS value/prices! If, as you say, the # of accounts playing in Wild drops from 75K to 13K- the amount of SPS rented should also drop

@davemccoy, Can we just acknowledge some of the slew other things that will happen? New players will be blocked out from playing in Wild and never come back to the game. (Because Modern/Bronze is an

This Proposal is SO pro-bot, it's actually both pro-bot and anti-player at the same time! First, the proposal we adjust the SPS staking reward multiplier for Wild format so that the amount of staked SPS

One of my accounts (YodinsWhore) can't ever combine cards through the PM interface. I have to use the (atrocious) SPL interface whenever I want/have to combine my Reward/Gladiator cards. She does only

On the first point: "the multiplier for the rating of 1899 (12x) would be applied." (the 'payout' rating vs. actual rating) That's great- will save me quite a bit in SPS rentals! On the second

There were a few other differences between the proposals too you didn't discriminate against CP no CP cooldown for delegated cards and a few more little differences. Overall your original proposal was

You are right. I had to double-check this one- there IS a requirement for Bronze! Which just seems dumb but who am I to say?

Absolutely. I know all about @bronko's other proposal. It's, as you say, basically the same; there's just a change to one word in his statement: "accounts with a completely normal deck and no harmful

I didn't even look at @bronko's collection and I came to about the same conclusion, simply based on "cui bono" Who benefits from this proposal? Whales. Nouveau riche whales, to be exact. I would

How about, instead of penalizing players for not having the 'proper' level of card- we institute a multiplier based on the level/rarity of the cards fielded? The level 'penalty' was bad, for many, many

Small question regarding the calculation of "X multiplier" Would that be calculated at the rating it 'earns' at (in this case 1899) or at its actual rating? Ie. an account with 50K of CP that

I have to say- I agree with @bronko, completely. "accounts with a completely normal deck and no harmful behavior will have to rent CP unnecessarily. This doesn’t make sense" Setting up another,