RE: RE: Centralization-proofing in three parts
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Centralization-proofing in three parts

awbvious(44)
Published in
HODL
Words
133
Reading
1 min
Listen
Play
6y

Yes, we are in agreement, sometimes accumulate, sometimes effect. Especially since, when money is made most important in a system, it might be the only way to make a change to the system, such as making it less important. The tricky thing is knowing when to do either, and whether it'll be possible to switch between the two, seeing, as again, power corrupts etc. You may think, finally, I have enough for myself to be comfortable, but what about your immediate family, what about providing for decendents... Is it simply power corrupt or is it more that people who seek it are ambitious types who would continually be ambitious. Would it occur to those who wanted wealth to then change the system from being controlled by wealth. I have none of these answers.

@awbvious: Yes, we are in | Ecency