What specifically is "GeekSpeak, BaffleGab and TechnoSpeak" and bullshit?

That's why I said, "taking over", rather than somehow replacing or eliminating. We already can build biological computers, but only very rudimentary ones. Like in DNA computing. When you get

Insightful arguments. I am not sure what will happen, but I think genetic engineering will end up taking over computing and robotics.

Very interesting stuff. I didn't know much about Tyndale. I found it very enlightening to read up more about his life as well. I appreciate the effort you've put into this. Please continue. :)

Joseph Dunphy's response here kinda points out how the Salem Hypothesis does, kinda, emerge from nothing.

I'm working on that too.

"You can see that wang is not actually the best curator, relative to Steem Power, there are human curators above wang that are relatively more profitable." How do you know the top curators are

How do you draw the conclusion that putting constraints on the time when a vote is cast does anything to help solve that problem? It doesn't. The bots just wait until whatever amount of time elapses before

I'm voting because you told me not to vote. Plus, your content looks great. Get the reward while you can, you earned it.

So, instead, there will be 1000 bots voting sometime between 15 minutes to 0 minutes after a post, over time, as bots compete for what little they can get. The solution doesn't fix the problem. It just

And you have to leave the post open in a tab or whatever, remember to come back to to later? Crazy talk. All because of bots? Let the bots ruin everything?

Hey man, glad your life was changed by the experience so far. :) I /thought/ about doing a daily pick, or weekly pick type post, but you actually went ahead and did it before I got around to it. You win.

Great post. What do you think about this proton charge radius problem? New physics? Looks like it!

There's some obvious polarization when it comes to whether bots should be part of curation or not. I'm strictly on the side of bots because bots are just an extension of ourselves. They are programmed

Yeah, it should be there. But there's just the issue in the label, no references to any commits. I've searched through the commit history and can't find anything. Weird. I've asked for the commit info

I can't find any commits that implement the minimal rshares check. There's no commits attached to the issue ( Where's the code change? Are you sure it made it in?

See and I can't find the particular change in the source code, however. :-S

Thanks for being right on top of it. Much appreciated! Download commencing ... :)

Another limitation is the algorithm for weighing your vote based on age. What about short posts that take 1 second to read and you like it? You vote it up and it goes to the moon and you get a pittance.

Yes, because voting power decreases with votes cast, then I am always consciously thinking of whether or not I should vote on something based on my past history of voting. Think about that for a second.