By Anna Von Reitz
”We have another would-be guru, getting some of it right, some of it wrong…”
”…Mostly, this woman doesn't recognize the difference between a ‘state’ described in 8 USC Chapter 12, Section 1101 in Federal Code, which applies to their foreign ‘state nationals’ (1101 (a) 21) versus one of our States of the Union and our ‘State Nationals’.
She's right to blow an alarm about David Straight, whose process only helps people who are legitimately Federal Citizens or ‘citizens of the United States’---people who want to stay attached to the federal teats for some reason of their own, while at the same time, reclaiming their constitutional Guarantees.
There is nothing wrong with that so far as it goes. Americans who happen to work for one of the Federal Corporations should not be left without their constitutional protections--- but in the same token, David Straight's process doesn't go all the way home…”
”…Let me repeat this again --- we have three populations in this country, one that is the General Public and population of this country, people who live in States of the Union, and two other populations that are foreign corporation employees and dependents of Federal Government Subcontractors--- the so-called ‘federal citizenry’ who both ‘reside’ in our States of the Union under the Residence Act.
Within the terms of their federal government, they have ‘states’ like American Samoa, which are ‘states’ within their system, and Possessions -- not States -- within ours…”
”… She's right that not voting in their elections means that we have no voice in their elections --- but if we are not shareholders in their corporations we have neither any right nor any reason to vote in their corporation elections, do we?
Think about it. These Federal Corporations are just like GM or IBM or McDonald's Corporation. I don't own stock in those corporations. What business would I have attending one of their stockholder elections and (a) either giving my proxy to someone to vote ‘for’ me, or (b) vote in one of their stockholder elections myself?
None…”
”…Again, this woman gets some of it right. Her Shinola Sensors are on, and that's encouraging. We shouldn't be swearing (period) and we shouldn't be offering our allegiance to anyone or anything but our Creator. She's right about that.
Our allegiance has to be to a Higher Calling than acting as servants or slaves to an inanimate thing like a flag or even to the fallen Federal Republic that that particular flag ‘stands for’.
Our American Government exists to serve us. We do not exist to serve it, though some of us, for a period of time, freely choose to serve as government officers or officials for the common good of our country or the good of our individual States of the Union.
Ours is a far different kind of ‘Citizenship’ than that foisted on British Citizens or citizens of the Municipality of Washington, DC -- that is, different from ‘federal citizenship’ of either kind.
Our American version of ‘Citizenship’ is entirely voluntary. It begins when we enter an Office to serve our Public, and it ends when we retire or de-commission from that Office. It is certainly not attached to a British Territorial Title IV Flag, and by the way, that Title IV Flag is not the flag that flew as the Star-Spangled Banner over Fort McHenry.
I have just today written down the entire fraud and differing law (European) surrounding the Christian Name, the Surname, and what the two federal corporations do to interpret these names as property claims entered in behalf of Christ and alternatively, in behalf of the British Monarch...”
read the entire article here!
