i did attempt to report one user using your form a couple of weeks ago, but i was blocked for some reason & lost the data.

i subsequently tagged you instead while commenting on one of that users posts (albeit a different post) and received your response saying you could find nothing wrong with it. Had i tagged you on the other post of that user which i was also commenting on you may have got more of the picture though.

"The idea is to create original content for Hive not dump years of someone's blogs into Hive blockchain to farm rewards/get paid for that copypasa spam.". This of course is very valid. There are many nuances to consider whixh are probably not often considered by those reading a post by someone complaining about hivewatchers. i realise it's not an easy or popular job, but it could be made easier by documenting details such as this and the one below.

So, rather than just jumping on that aspect of my comment, how about my other point?

It would be good for users to know this:
"There are some users who are an exception to this as they are popular influencers and they actively promote Hive on other platforms."
What are the criteria for this?
i'm not against this, i just think it important we have transparency. If people know the rules (which could potentially be adapted for different circumstances) surely this would make Hive a better place and we could retain more users who may also support Hive on other platforms.